Recently Visited

  • Getting bills...

News, Commentary, and What to Watch on WashingtonWatch.com Blog Feed

Congress to Produce Earmark Data?

earmarkpigA bill introduced in the Senate yesterday would require Congress to bring earmarks out of the shadows, producing earmark data in a format that the public can easily use.

S. 3335 would require Congress to establish a “unified and searchable database on a public website for congressional earmarks.”

This is something President Obama called for in his 2010 State of the Union speech, though we haven’t heard much more from him about it since then.

The bill was introduced by Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), and is currently cosponsored by Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), and Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO).

Importantly the bill is not just about a web site. The bill would enable the public to “programmatically search and access all data in a serialized machine readable format via a web-services application programming interface.” That gobbledegook means that people could access the data for themselves, slicing and dicing it to learn whatever they wanted or display it however they want. We’ve started mapping data for this year’s earmarks here.

In our hugely successful earmarks contest last year, we collected over 40,000 earmark requests.

Our campaign to get earmark data from Congress is at Earmarkdata.org. There is a petition there for you to sign, and we recommend asking your member of Congress and senators to support the earmark data effort.

In the meantime, here’s the vote on S. 3335. Click to vote, comment, learn more, or edit the wiki article about the bill.

Visitor Comments for Congress to Produce Earmark Data? RSS 2.0

Congress Moves Closer to Producing Earmark Data – The WashingtonWatch.com Blog

[…] wrote up the bill when it was introduced. And in our hugely successful earmarks contest last year, we collected over […]

Add Comment

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.