Home

Blog

Recently Visited

  • Getting bills...

News, Commentary, and What to Watch on WashingtonWatch.com Blog Feed

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – August 24, 2015

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of August 24, 2015. Subscribe (free!) here.

On the Blog: National Parks

A staple of congressional behavior is creating national parks, monuments, and such to commemorate events in our history, to preserve the country’s natural beauty-oh, and also to win credit back home.

Read about some examples is a post entitled: “Let’s Make a National Park!

Featured Item

The House and Senate continue their summer break this week. When Congress returns, it will have a short time to establish spending levels for government agencies in the 2016 fiscal year, which begins October 1st.

The largest annual spending bill is H.R. 3020, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016. The bill would spend over $8,000 per U.S. family, mostly on retirement and health entitlement programs.

H.R. 3020
The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
Costs $8,357.95 per family

What People Think

Click here to vote on The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016. Click here to vote on The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016.

The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
22% For, 78% Against

Vote on this Bill


Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

H.R. 3032
The Securities and Exchange Commission Reporting Modernization Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1500
The Sensible Environmental Protection Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 1839
The RAISE Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1523
A bill to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the National Estuary Program, and for other purposes
Costs $0.96 per family

H.R. 3154
The E-Warranty Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2912
The Centennial Monetary Commission Act of 2015
Costs $0.01 per family

S. 1483
The James K. Polk Presidential Home Study Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 403
The North Country National Scenic Trail Route Adjustment Act
Costs $0.04 per family

S. 521
The President Street Station Study Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 145
The National Park Access Act
Costs $0.02 per family

S. 610
The Thurgood Marshall’s Elementary School Study Act
Costs $0.00 per family


Updated Items

none


Passed Items

none

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

Let’s Make a National Park!

Among the many fun things our representatives do is creating national parks, monuments, and such to commemorate events in our history, to preserve the country’s natural beauty—oh, and also to win credit back home.

1024px-President_Street_Station_-_Baltimore_1856Members of the House and Senate are home for the summer, but last week the Congressional Budget Office issued cost estimates for a number of small bills aimed at adding to the nation’s store of significant places. They come at a minor cost, but those costs can add up. So let’s take a look at some spots that might become national parks.

S. 521 is called the President Street Station Study Act. It authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a “special resource study” of President Street Station in Baltimore, Maryland.

According to Wikipedia, President Street Station is a former train station built in 1850. It was an important rail transportation link during the Civil War. Today, it is the oldest surviving big-city railroad terminal in the United States and is home to the Baltimore Civil War Museum.

The study authorized by S. 521 would cost about $200,000, which is less than a penny per family in the United States. After it’s done, presumably, President Street Station may be turned into a unit of the national park system.

Here’s what people think about S. 521. Click to vote, comment, learn more, or edit the wiki article about the bill.

polk homeNext up, S. 1483, the James K. Polk Presidential Home Study Act.

The bill would authorize a similar study of the home in Columbia, Tennessee, built by the father of the 11th president of the United States and occupied by him and his wife, Sarah Polk.

The study set up by S. 1483 would also cost about $200,000, or less than a penny per U.S. family.

Here’s the current vote on that bill.

800px-PS_103_Old_W_Balt_HD_T_MarshallThe same kind of study would be authorized for a place in West Baltimore, Maryland, by S. 610, the Thurgood Marshall’s Elementary School Study Act. The Associate Director, Park Planning, Facilities and Lands, at the National Park Service in the Department of the Interior testified about S. 610 as follows:

P.S. 103 was originally built in 1877 for West Baltimore’s white immigrant population but, in 1911, it became a segregated African-American school serving the Upton community of West Baltimore. The school is significant for its role in the education of Thurgood Marshall, who is best known as the lead counsel for the landmark school desegregation case, Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and as the first African-American Supreme Court Justice. Marshall’s life and his life’s work began in Baltimore: it is the city where he was born in 1908, where he began his public education, and where he won his first civil rights cases as a young attorney. Thurgood Marshall attended P.S. 103 from 1st through 8th grade (1914 to 1921).

Marshall’s accomplishments in systematically dismantling the legal framework for Jim Crow segregation are the foundation upon which the success of the Civil Rights Movement was built. P.S. 103 is owned by the City of Baltimore and is included in the Baltimore National Heritage Area.

Like the others, this study would cost about $200,000, which rounds to $0.00 per U.S. family.

Here’s the current vote on S. 610. Click to vote, comment, learn more, or edit the wiki article on the bill.

(1 comment | Categories: Uncategorized » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – August 16, 2015

On the Blog: Twitter!

We’ve got a Tweet lined up for newly introduced bills until mid-September. That’s a lot of bills. It’s also an opportunity to contribute to the conversation and increase your personal power.

Read about it in a post entitled: “Twitter’s Most Powerful Advocate.”

Featured Item

The House and Senate are on their summer break.

S. 1910 is the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2016. It’s the Senate counterpart to H.R. 2995.

The bills propose fiscal year 2016 spending on the Treasury Department, the District of Columbia, the judicial branch, and the Executive Office of the President.

Passage of S. 1910 would spend about $410 per U.S. family, a little bit more than the house bill.

S. 1910
The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2016
Costs $410.42 per family

What People Think

Click here to vote on The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2016. Click here to vote on The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2016.

The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2016
50% For, 50% Against

Vote on this Bill


Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

H.R. 1725
The National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2015
Costs $0.37 per family

H.R. 598
The Taxpayers Right-To-Know Act
Costs $0.69 per family

S. 1616
The Saving Federal Dollars Through Better Use of Government Purchase and Travel Cards Act of 2015
Costs $0.56 per family

H.R. 2820
The Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Reauthorization Act of 2015
Costs $1.88 per family

S. 1632
A bill to require a regional strategy to address the threat posed by Boko Haram
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1808
The Northern Border Security Review Act
Costs $0.01 per family

S. 1846
A bill to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to secure critical infrastructure against electromagnetic threats, and for other purposes
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1910
The Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2016
Costs $410.42 per family


Updated Items

none


Passed Items

P.L. 114-45
The LINE Act of 2015

P.L. 114-46
The Sawtooth National Recreation Area and Jerry Peak Wilderness Additions Act
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-47
The Land Management Workforce Flexibility Act
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-48
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 83 Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, as the “J. Waties Waring Judicial Center”
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-49
To designate the “PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway” in the State of Texas

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

Twitter’s Most Powerful Advocate

twitterIn March, we told you about the WashingtonWatch.com user who is having an outsized influence by voting on every single bill that appears on our site. That communicates to other visitors that someone among their peers favors or disfavors a bill, suggesting they should share that view. Ultimately, it’s a way to have influence on Washington, D.C.

There are other small but important ways to influence Washington. One of them is practiced by Twitter user @ReneeNal. Renee, you see, follows @WashingtonWatch and regularly retweets our new bill tweets with just a little bit of her own commentary.

That tells her 6,800+ followers that an interesting bill is out there, that they should have an opinion, and that they should consider informing their followers about it. We typically retweet comments, expanding Renee’s influence to our small but growing audience.

Starting with this Congress we’ve been tweeting a brief summary and link for just about every bill that gets introduced.

That’s plenty of material, by the way. We’ve got hourly tweets queued up well into September, each for a different bill introduced before Congress went on its August recess. (Too many bills? Perhaps…)

Now, you don’t have to agree with Renee, and our job is not to decide who’s right and who’s wrong. We’ll retweet sharp comments (or not-so-sharp!) from any perspective. The point is to communicate to people about public policy.

Politics and policy are social processes, and they are better with your participation than without, even if you do just a little bit. So, Twitter users, follow @washingtonWatch and start retweeting bills from time to time with your comments. If you’re not a Twitter user, become one, follow @WashingtonWatch, and make your contribution to the conversation. It’s a way of growing your role in U.S. public policy and getting control of what happens in Washington, D.C.

(1 comment | Categories: About WashingtonWatch.com » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – August 10, 2015

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of August 10, 2015. Subscribe (free!) here.

On the Blog: Trump!

How ’bout that Donald Trump! Oh, by the way: “You’ve Been Had.”

Featured Item

The House and Senate are on their summer break.

Last week, H.R. 3236, the Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act, was introduced, passed in both houses of Congress, and signed by the President.

The new law extends transportation programs and excludes workers covered by TRICARE or the VA from employee counts for Obamacare’s “minimum essential health care coverage” requirement for employers.

Passage of Public Law number 114-41 costs about $39 per U.S. family and decreases the national debt about $36.

P.L. 114-41
The Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015
Costs $39.03 per family

What People Think

Click here to vote on The Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015. Click here to vote on The Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015.

The Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015
33% For, 67% Against

Vote on this Bill


Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

H.R. 1937
The National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2320
The Federal Improper Payments Coordination Act of 2015
Costs $0.06 per family

S. 1573
The National Weather Service Improvement Act
Costs $0.01 per family

H.R. 3114
To provide funds to the Army Corps of Engineers to hire veterans and members of the Armed Forces to assist the Corps with curation and historic preservation activities, and for other purposes
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2899
The Countering Violent Extremism Act of 2015
Costs $0.35 per family

H.R. 3089
The GONE Act
Costs $0.07 per family

H.R. 1613
The Federal Vehicle Repair Cost Savings Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 833
The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Earthquake Protection and Improvement Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1946
The Tax Relief Extension Act of 2015
Saves $969.15 per family

S. 1881
A bill to prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood Federation of America
Costs $0.00 per family


Updated Items

S. 501
The New Mexico Navajo Water Settlement Technical Corrections Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 136
The Gold Star Fathers Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 1531
The Land Management Workforce Flexibility Act
Costs $0.00 per family


Passed Items

P.L. 114-41
The Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015
Costs $39.03 per family

P.L. 114-42
The NOTICE Act
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-43
The DHS IT Duplication Reduction Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-44
The Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

You’ve Been Had

That Donald Trump is sure a piece of work. The thing with Fox News’s Megyn Kelly? Wow. The Republican party leadership doesn’t want him there, but how do they get rid of him without inducing a third-party run? That would sap Republican votes.

It’s a good time to be a Democrat. (Shhhh. Don’t interrupt while Trump is messing things up for the other team!) But do we really want a Hillary coronation? #FeelTheBern! Has the Democratic party scheduled enough debates to give other candidates a chance?

If these topics are where you’re focused, you’ve been had. You’ve let politics distract you from the business of government.

While you’re watching the political drama around a presidential election that won’t happen for another fifteen months, you’re ignoring Congress’s mismanagement of the U.S. federal government right now. You’re treating politics as a spectator sport when you should be treating governance as a participatory sport.

You see, Congress is supposed to pass appropriations bills each summer, allocating spending for the next fiscal year, which begins in October. When they don’t do this, agencies can’t plan. They can’t move forward with projects. Your tax money gets wasted—no matter what you think of the projects the agencies would do.

With the House already on break, the Senate took off at the end of the week last week for its summer recess without a single FY 2016 appropriations bill having been passed. Not one.

Some in Congress recognize the need to act responsibly. In late July, the Senate Appropriations Committee put out a press release congratulating itself for passing all appropriations bills for the first time in six years. But the full Senate hasn’t acted on any of them. The House has passed a few bills, but Congress as a whole hasn’t completed work on anything.

What do you do about this? How do you get involved? Well, by this point in the FY 2016 appropriations cycle, it’s pretty much too late. When Congress returns in September, there will be just a few legislative days before the beginning of the new fiscal year.

But you can let your member of Congress and senators know that you are displeased. You can contact them and say that you expect appropriations to be done on time. If your representatives are Republicans, you can let them know that you will not vote for a Republican next November if appropriations were not finalized on time.

Nothing changes if you do nothing. Something might change if you do something. So contact your member of Congress, and encourage your friends and co-workers to do the same!

(4 comments | Categories: Appropriations/Budget » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – August 3, 2015

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of August 3, 2015. Subscribe (free!) here.

On the Blog: Last Week was Confusing

And when is Congress not confusing?

Congress debated transportation spending and Obamacare last week. We unpack and simplify some of the debate in a post entitled: “Oh, What a Tangled Web We Weave.”

Featured Item

The House has begun its summer break. It will return to Washington, D.C., the second week of September.

This week, the Senate will debate a bill to deny federal funding to Planned Parenthood. While withdrawing money from the recently controversial organization, S. 1881 would not reduce overall funding for women’s health.

There is no cost/savings estimate yet for S. 1881.

S. 1881
A bill to prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood Federation of America

What People Think

Click here to vote on S. 1881. Click here to vote on S. 1881.

S. 1881
66% For, 34% Against

Vote on this Bill


Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

S. 1292
The HUBZone Revitalization Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 1656
The Secret Service Improvements Act of 2015
Costs $0.07 per family

S. 1115
The GONE Act
Costs $0.07 per family

H.R. 1927
The Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 627
A bill to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to revoke bonuses paid to employees involved in electronic wait list manipulations, and for other purposes
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1493
The Veterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2015
Costs $6.19 per family

S. 1082
The Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 373
The Vessel Incidental Discharge Act
Costs $0.04 per family

H.R. 3116
The Quarterly Financial Report Reauthorization Act
Costs $0.22 per family

S. 1484
The Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015
Costs $1.46 per family

H.R. 1992
The American Soda Ash Competitiveness Act
Saves $0.69 per family

S. 280
The Federal Permitting Improvement Act of 2015
Costs $1.07 per family

H.R. 1949
The National Liberty Memorial Clarification Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 959
The Medgar Evers House Study Act
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2494
The Global Anti-Poaching Act
Costs $0.05 per family

S. 261
A bill to designate the United States courthouse located at 200 NW 4th Street in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as the William J. Holloway, Jr. United States Courthouse
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2954
To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, as the “Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United States Court House”
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 3236
The Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015
Costs $38.91 per family


Updated Items

none


Passed Items

P.L. 114-38
The Veterans Entrepreneurship Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-39
The Medicare Independence at Home Medical Practice Demonstration Improvement Act of 2015

P.L. 114-40
The Steve Gleason Act of 2015
Costs $0.22 per family

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

Oh, What a Tangled Web We Weave

460427632_d69c38acb0_zDeceitful or not, convoluted legislative processes keep you, the public, from following along. That keeps you from having a say. It takes your power away.

So let’s see how Washington’s convoluted processes worked this past week!

The subject is transportation spending. It’s a bipartisan issue, so you don’t hear about it very much. Everyone in Washington, D.C., is agreed on transportation spending. Insiders have no interest in drawing the attention of you outsiders, because you might complain! (And maybe you agree with it—just sayin’…)

The last major transportation bill to pass was MAP-21 three years ago. It spent about $230 per U.S. family on surface transportation programs, but do NOT trust such estimates. Congress uses all kinds of budget gimmicks such as “rising baseline” budgeting to skew the numbers. They use a “Highway Trust Fund” to pretend Congress isn’t levying taxes and spending the money.

In August 2014, Congress passed a short extension of transportation spending programs through May 31, 2015. Cost: about $30 per family. (Don’t trust that number.)

When Congress couldn’t agree on a long-term bill by then, they passed another short-term extension with a July 31, 2015 deadline for getting transportation spending figured out. There was no official cost estimate for that bill. (Finally, a lack of number you can trust!)

A bill wasn’t finalized by the end of the week last week. The Senate took H.R. 22 (formerly a bill to exempt employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from being taken into account for purposes of the Obamacare employer mandate) and turned it into the new transportation funding bill. At the same time, an amendment to re-establish the Export-Import Bank got put in. That was not popular with some who had just fought to end it. H.R. 22 passed the Senate, but it is not going to get passed by the House.

The House went ahead and passed another bill to exempt workers covered by military health care coverage from employee counts for the purposes of Obamacare. H.J. Res. 61, the Hire More Heroes Act of 2015, saves about $6.30 per U.S. family.

It also passed H.R. 3236, the Surface Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act of 2015. That bill extended transportation spending until October 29, 2015, and it took service members and veterans with health care coverage out of employee counts for purposes of employer mandates in Obamacare. That bill has a combination of spending and revenues that cause it to cost about $39 per U.S. family, while decreasing their share of the national debt by about $36.

All make sense?

If so, then you probably have an opinion on H.R. 3236. Here’s the current vote on the bill. CLick to vote, comment, learn more, or edit the wiki article about it.

(1 comment | Categories: Health Care, Transportation » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – July 27, 2015

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of July 27, 2015. Subscribe (free!) here.

On the Blog: Reining in the Bureaucracy

Congress is thinking about reining in federal regulatory agencies. Should it?

Read about it in a post entitled: “Reining in the Regulators”.”

Featured Item

This week, the House will debate H.R. 427, the Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015.

The bill would provide that major regulations have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law.

Passage of H.R. 427 would have a negligible cost.

H.R. 427
The Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

What People Think

Click here to vote on The Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015. Click here to vote on The Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015.

The Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015
85% For, 15% Against

Vote on this Bill


Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

H.R. 22
The Hire More Heroes Act of 2015
Costs $2,614.12 per family

H.R. 1634
The Border Security Technology Accountability Act of 2015
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1182
A bill to exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing agreements
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2750
The Improved Security Vetting for Aviation Workers Act of 2015
Costs $0.06 per family

H.R. 1138
The Sawtooth National Recreation Area and Jerry Peak Wilderness Additions Act
Costs $0.00 per family

H. J. Res. 61
The Hire More Heroes Act of 2015
Saves $6.27 per family

S. 1705
The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016
Costs $4.71 per family

H.R. 487
To allow the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to lease or transfer certain lands
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1599
The Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act of 2015
Costs $0.02 per family

H.R. 3128
The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2016
Costs $434.36 per family

H.R. 2315
The Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act of 2015
Saves $0.00 per family

H.R. 158
The Visa Waiver Program Improvement Act of 2015
Costs $0.06 per family

S. 1253
The Patient Access to Disposable Medical Technology Act of 2015
Saves $0.12 per family

S. 1603
The Border Jobs for Veterans Act of 2015
Costs $0.05 per family

H.R. 1994
The VA Accountability Act of 2015
Saves $1.32 per family

S. 607
The Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Extension Act of 2015
Costs $0.01 per family

H.R. 2843
The TSA PreCheck Expansion Act
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2770
The Keeping our Travelers Safe and Secure Act
Costs $0.00 per family


Updated Items

none


Passed Items

P.L. 114-31
The Veteran’s I.D. Card Act

P.L. 114-32
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the “Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office”

P.L. 114-33
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 141 Paloma Drive in Floresville, Texas, as the “Floresville Veterans Post Office Building”

P.L. 114-34
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, Florida, as the “Sergeant First Class Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office”

P.L. 114-35
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 442 East 167th Street in Bronx, New York, as the “Herman Badillo Post Office Building”

P.L. 114-36
To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude certain cotton futures contracts from coverage under such Act
Costs $0.00 per family

P.L. 114-37
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14 3rd Avenue, NW, in Chisholm, Minnesota, as the “James L. Oberstar Memorial Post Office Building”

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

Reining in the Regulators

reinsWhich do you like better? Health, safety, and the environment? Or democracy?

That’s the tension in a bill getting debate in the House this week. H.R. 427 is the Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015, or REINS Act. (Get it? REINS. Like, “reining in the regulators.”)

The bill would rein in regulators by requiring “major” regulations to be approved by Congress before they can take effect. Major regulations are those that would have effects of $100 million or more on the economy.

Regulators prevent toxic chemicals from polluting our waterways. They make sure people are safe at work, in their cars, and in the skies. Regulators oversee the health care marketplace and investments. You don’t want Congress standing in their way. So goes the argument against the REINS Act.

Regulators gum up the economy, prevent innovation, take away property rights, and undercut our nation’s small businesses with expensive, intrusive mandates. The regulatory process is also undemocratic. We should have Congress in charge of regulation—the Constitution doesn’t say anything about having a huge regulatory bureaucracy. Those are some of the arguments in favor of the REINS Act.

There are practical points about the REINS Act that are pretty important. If the bill passes into law, watch regulators take their revenge by breaking their big regulations into several smaller pieces, each one of which doesn’t have that $100 million effect on the economy. You’ll have the appearance that Congress is getting the bureaucracy, but you won’t get that result.

But maybe the REINS Act is a first step toward Congress reasserting responsibility for all that the federal government does. Over decades, they have dropped the reins, and this is a step toward picking them back up.

The right answer, as always, is your call.

Should Congress approve major regulations? Or should it leave regulators alone so they can do their health, safety, and environmental protection jobs?

Here is the current vote on H.R. 427, the Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015. Click to vote, comment, learn more, or edit the wiki article on the bill.

(1 comment | Categories: Regulation » )