Home

Blog

Recoil UH-60 Blackhawk Helicopter Wild Land Fire-Fighting Tank System
$4,160,000

This earmark request is for the 2010 fiscal year.

Sen. Jeff Merkley (OR) requests $4,160,000 for:
Recoil Suppression Systems, LLC
OR

(show me on a map)

Revision History Revisions Feed for This Bill

Below is the revision history of this article.

(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)

(Latest | Earliest)

To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Rocket

September 23, 2009, 7:54pm (report abuse)

Excellent idea and system. With all the destructive wildfires we see in the west and the loss of property, it is good to see our tax dollars fight something else besides a war. This impacts us right here at home.

fred jones

December 9, 2009, 2:52am (report abuse)

great idea is this the Helitak tank designed and manufactured in Austalia?

Walt

March 7, 2010, 1:36am (report abuse)

You have two perfectly capable companies already building fixed firetanks for helicopters in Oregon..ISOLAIR and SIMPLEX..both very capable and both with proven track records in fire suppression..Why waste U.S. tax payers dollars on new research and development when these folks can have you up and running in no time...OH by the way.. I am Canadian and we are proud to operate helicopter systems by both manuafacturers.. I think your Senator Merlkley needs to meet a few of these fine people of Oregon ( ISOLAIR and SIMPLEX )who not only provide the citizens of America a fine product but also the citizens of the world who have had their homes, and at times their LIVES saved by the products ISOLAIR and SIMPLEX have been supplying to helicopter operators in every corner of the planet..

Mustang Steve

March 11, 2010, 1:18am (report abuse)

This system was plagarised from the Helitak System when the 2 Australian Directors didn't get the deal they wanted from Helitak in Australia. It is disappointing to see our limited Tax dollars being handed out to foreigners supporting their unscrupulous business dealings in our own country.

Debbie

March 18, 2010, 9:37pm (report abuse)

$4,160,000????? REALLY????? thats so very wasteful and what does this have to do with the healthcare bill in the first place and WHYS it even in the healthcare bill??????? this is such WASTEFUL SPENDING!!!!!!!!

Jafco

May 6, 2010, 9:33pm (report abuse)

Absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt the biggest waste of taxpayer funds. These Hawk drivers are professional soldiers and in no way should they be allowed into the fire fighting arena. Sen. Merkley is simply creating jobs and maybe wealth in his state.

Chuck Brainerd

May 7, 2010, 2:01pm (report abuse)

If this money is going to be earmarked for UH-60 tank development, then it should be an open and fair competition to interested parties.

Homer

May 12, 2010, 4:22pm (report abuse)

Why should these guys get $4 million to develop their system? Why havn't they developed themselves? Do Simplex and Isolair ask the govt for dollars when they want to build something that they are going to makes loads of money from?

Those guys in Australia have already developed their system. I bet $4 million could buy a bunch of those ones from helitack.

Jeff Burton

August 20, 2011, 9:57pm (report abuse)

What a waste of taxpayer money. We built a tank system for the S-61 for alot less than what they are asking for. Our project went from bar napkin to working prototype in under 6 months.

T.G.

June 11, 2012, 2:58pm (report abuse)

Did anyone look into Joe Rice who this earmark was for ??? Didn't think so.

Justice4DaveLewis

July 13, 2014, 8:19pm (report abuse)

Mr. Merkley apparently did not vet Joe Rice before gouging taxpayers on his behalf. If he had; Carson helicopters would have told him that Rice was fired for lying. He is an individual who should not be trusted. Other businesses in Oregon were not given a chance to obtain these finances. This is wrong.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Earmark

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this earmark! (Learn more about RSS.)