Discussion: H.R. 4089, The Sportsmen's Heritage Act of 2012

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Revision History Revisions Feed for This Bill

Below is the revision history of this article's discussion.

No revisions found.

Learn More

    Costs: $0.11 per
    and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $0.11.
    (source info)

  • Read the Bill
  • Read an Analysis of the Bill
  • See What People Are Saying

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – April 16, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of April 16, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Tax Bills on Parade With taxes due this week, the Senate and House are...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Ken Parsons

April 16, 2012, 10:54am (report abuse)

On first reading of this legislation one may say “good deal for hunters and fisherman” BUT wait a minute. I already have the right to hunt, fish and shoot on public land. What this legislation does in my opinion is allow “local authority” federal land managers to close off, not expand what I already can do. Too many “managers” BLM, Forest Service, Fish and Game (both state and federal) already use “their local authority” to close off public lands. Many places I went as a young man to view wildlife are now padlocked to prevent entry. If you want to allow Polar bear importations then use another route other than disguise a method of more restriction of land use.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)