What People Think
25% For, 75% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
![]() ![]() |
For |
![]() ![]() |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
![]() ![]() |
Comment on this Bill |
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
S. 426, The Social Security Solvency Act of 2009 (2 comments ↓)
S. 426 would amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for progressive indexing and longevity indexing of Social Security old-age insurance benefits for newly retired and aged surviving spouses to ensure the future solvency of the Social Security program.
()
[102 views]
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)










Visitor Comments
Lynn Lewis
March 4, 2009, 11:36am (report abuse)Nobody without a law degree can understand this. It is ridiculous to do anything other than manage the Social Security fund with its original intent: what we put it in is what we get out. Otherwise, allow us to take out our fair share and invest it ourselves. End of story.
bhetti
May 17, 2009, 1:11pm (report abuse)I don't understand how this bill makes SS more fair unless it incorporates earnings sharing so divorced disabled women aren't left in the cold.