Home

Blog

What People Think

25% For, 75% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 426, The Social Security Solvency Act of 2009 (2 comments ↓)

S. 426 would amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for progressive indexing and longevity indexing of Social Security old-age insurance benefits for newly retired and aged surviving spouses to ensure the future solvency of the Social Security program.

(read more ↓)
[102 views]


Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Lynn Lewis

March 4, 2009, 11:36am (report abuse)

Nobody without a law degree can understand this. It is ridiculous to do anything other than manage the Social Security fund with its original intent: what we put it in is what we get out. Otherwise, allow us to take out our fair share and invest it ourselves. End of story.

bhetti

May 17, 2009, 1:11pm (report abuse)

I don't understand how this bill makes SS more fair unless it incorporates earnings sharing so divorced disabled women aren't left in the cold.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)