Home

Blog

What People Think

50% For, 50% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 1031, The National Nursing Shortage Reform and Patient Advocacy Act (6 comments ↓)

S. 1031 would amend the Public Health Service Act to establish direct care registered nurse-to-patient staffing ratio requirements in hospitals.

(read more ↓)
[78 views]


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Bad timing

May 31, 2009, 5:37am (report abuse)

Good intentions but I think a nationwide mandate at these hard economic times is not appropriate.

The healthcare industry is the only one thriving nowadays and doing this now would kill it.

This will also exacerbate the nursing shortage rather than solve it and the very few areas w/c does not have one will suddenly have an artificial shortage. California has a mandatory ratio for 5-6 years now and yet they are still reporting shortages (even at these times) and still projecting more in the years to come.

Just shows that simply enforcing a nurse-to-patient ratio and increasing salaries is not enough to attract more nurses.

My2cents

June 12, 2009, 1:55pm (report abuse)

I disagree since I already work in healthcare as an RN. If you look at CA, there are still shortages but nowhere as badly as before. Also, being forced to take care of more patients highly increases the likelihood of errors and poor patient care. Maybe you should try it before putting your comments out about it. Also, the healthcare industry is not thriving - hospitals are closing, laying off staff (ie, increasing the number of patients per nurse), freezing yearly increases and even stopping their 401K matches for emlpoyees. So guess again!

Bad timing

June 13, 2009, 3:23pm (report abuse)

"If you look at CA, there are still shortages but nowhere as badly as before"

Did I say something different? Where did I say it did not improve things? It did but not enough.

And healthcare is thriving aka SURVIVING. Where did I say that they are not affected what so ever by the recession ?? You do know what thriving means don't you? It's true that there are some layoffs and freeze-hiring but overall the HC industry is still positive per the monthly jobs reports of the Dept. of Labor.

Hence, the use of the term THRIVING.

Also try addressing the bill and not just criticizing someone's comments (note I did say address the bill in addition to criticizing before you mis-interpret my comment again)

You fail to say what you think of the bill.

US Nurse Janet

August 6, 2009, 3:53pm (report abuse)

The main reason I left hospital nursing was due to the number of patient one had to care for on ones shift. Each year the amount seemed to clib until you finally had to admit to yourself that it was just to dangerous to try to care for everyone and do a safe job of it. One does make mistakes when overloaded and when a nurse is so burdened with so many rules and regulations then how is that nurse able to complete his or her job safely? This bill is a real need for the nurses of the USA if they are to care for their patients safely.

jlj

September 16, 2009, 8:16pm (report abuse)

As an RN, I agree with the nurses who spoke before me. Dangerous care is the care patients are receiving. It's time safety, instead of profit, becomes the priority! Patient's die everyday because they haven't had proper care at the bedside. Our hospital administrators should be ashame.

US RN Kathy

October 17, 2009, 1:23pm (report abuse)

Whose license and livlihood is at stake when admistrations cut staffing, increase patient loads and decrease ancillary personnel? It is not the CNO's, or managers who are in jeopardy, it is the patients and the direct care providers who are the biggest risk takers. We must limit our liabilites, if not with staffing mandates then with objective acuity limits given per RN. And the working direct patient RN's must approve the limits, not one of the thousands of "paper" nurses who haven't touched a patient in years.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)