What People Think
57% For, 43% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
![]() ![]() |
For |
![]() ![]() |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
![]() ![]() |
Comment on this Bill |
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 915, The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 (78 comments ↓ | 9 wiki edits: view article ↓)
H.R. 915 would amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal years 2009 through 2012, to improve aviation safety and capacity, to provide stable funding for the national aviation system.
Detailed Summary
FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 - <b>Title I: Authorizations - Subtitle A: Funding of FAA Programs - </b>(Sec. 101) Reauthorizes appropriations to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for FY2010-FY2012 for: (1) airport planning and development and noise compatibility planning programs (with a rescission of certain unobligated amounts for FY2009 and prior fiscal years); (2) air navigation facilities and equipment; (3) FAA operations; and (4) FAA research, engineering, and development. Authorizes additional appropriations from the general fund of the Treasury for aviation programs through FY2012.
<b>Subtitle B: Passenger Facility Charges - </b>(Sec. 111) Amends the airport improvement program (AIP) to increase passenger facility charge (PFC) amounts that can be imposed by an eligible agency to finance an eligible airport-related project.
Repeals the termination date for the pilot program for PFC at nonhub airports to make it permanent.
(Sec. 112) Expands eligibility requirements for airport-related projects to include projects for: (1) construction of airport bicycle storage facilities; and (2) an intermodal ground access pilot project.
(Sec. 113) Authorizes the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) to approve an eligible agency's application for authority to impose a PFC to finance airside projects for airports, provided the agency gives satisfactory written assurances that each contract and subcontract for program or construction management, architectural, engineering, and related services for such projects is awarded in the same way a contract for architectural and engineering services is negotiated with respect to federal property and administrative services requirements or an equivalent qualifications-based method prescribed for or by the agency.
(Sec. 115) Requires the Secretary to issue regulations that: (1) set goals for an eligible agency to ensure that contracts, subcontracts, and business opportunities funded using passenger facility revenues are awarded consistent with the levels of participation of disadvantaged business enterprises and airport concessions disadvantaged business enterprises that would be expected in the absence of discrimination; and (2) ensure that an eligible agency will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and administration of contracts funded using such revenues.
(Sec. 116) Directs the Secretary to study and report to Congress on: (1) the impacts on airports of accommodating connecting passengers; and (2) the treatment of airports at which the majority of passengers are connecting passengers (and not originating and destination passengers) under the PFC program.
<b>Subtitle C: Fees for FAA Services - </b>(Sec. 121) Directs the FAA Administrator to: (1) provide for the adjustment of overflight fees by May 1, 2010; and (2) establish user fees for aircraft owners or operators for certain FAA services.
<b>Subtitle D: AIP Modifications - </b>(Sec. 131) Revises the definition of airport development.
(Sec. 132) Requires an airport's master plan to address the feasibility of solid waste recycling and minimization of waste generation as a condition to the approval of an airport development project (AIP).
(Sec. 133) Revises requirements for written assurances on AIPs for acquiring land for a noise compatibility purpose to allow for reinvestment in a specified other kind of AIP of proceeds from disposition of the land proportional to the government's share of the cost of acquiring it.
(Sec. 134) Prescribes special rules for the federal share of allowable costs for AIP projects for: (1) transition from a small hub to medium hub airport status (90% share); and (2) economically depressed communities (95% share).
(Sec. 136) Creates a preference for the use of disabled veteran-owned small businesses in carrying out AIPs.
(Sec. 137) Directs the Secretary to: (1) issue final regulations to adjust the personal net worth cap used in determining whether an individual is economically disadvantaged for purposes for qualifying as a small business concern owned and operated by a socially and economically disadvantaged individual under the airport disadvantaged business program; and (2) establish a program to eliminate barriers to small business participation airport-related contracts and concessions by prohibiting excessive, unreasonable, or discriminatory bonding requirements for projects, especially those funded using passenger facility revenues.
(Sec. 138) Directs the Secretary to establish a mandatory training program for airport owners and operators on how to certify a small business airport concession as one owned and operated by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals under the airport disadvantaged business program. Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2012.
(Sec. 139) Reduces the amount of funds available for AIP state apportionments from 18.5% to 10% of the amount subject to apportionment for each fiscal year. Requires additional apportionments to states, however, for reliever and nonprimary commercial service airports (but not for primary airports).
Repeals the special apportionment rule for fiscal years in which the total amount made available for airport planning and development and noise compatibility planning and programs is $3.2 billion or more.
Requires the Secretary to make an additional AIP state apportionment for each reliever and nonprimary commercial service airport (but not for primary airports), according to the same formula used now under the special apportionment rule. Requires a pro rata reduction in such additional apportionment in any fiscal year in which the total amount made available for regular apportionment is less than $300 million.
(Sec. 140) Revises the formula for reducing the amount apportioned for an AIP in a fiscal year to the sponsor of an airport having at least .25% of the total number of boardings each year in the United States and for which a passenger facility fee is imposed. States that, in the case of a charge of more than $4.50 imposed by the sponsor of an airport enplaning at least 1% of the total number of boardings each year in the United States, the reduction amount shall be 100% of the projected revenues from the charge in the fiscal year, but not more than 100% of the amount that otherwise would be apportioned.
(Sec. 141) Revises the minimum amount to be credited to the AIP discretionary fund from amounts made available for airport planning and development and noise compatibility planning and programs. Replaces the current formula for such minimum amount with a flat $520 million.
(Sec. 142) Extends through FY2012 the eligibility of the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau to receive AIP discretionary grants and funding from the Small Airport Fund.
(Sec. 143) Revises requirements for special apportionments for grants for airport noise compatibility planning and programs to replace the 35% apportionment with a flat $300 million. Applies such apportionment, also, to water quality mitigation projects to comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
(Sec. 144) Revises exceptions to restrictions on the use of local taxes on aviation fuel or the revenues generated by an airport that is the subject of federal assistance. Excepts from such restrictions any proceeds from the sale of a private airport to a public sponsor that meets specified criteria, including repayment to the Secretary of the remaining unamortized portion of any AIP grant made for purposes other than land acquisition, plus the federal share of the current fair market value of any land acquired.
(Sec. 145) Revises certain requirements for approval of applications for exemption from specified revenue use requirements under the airport privatization pilot program.
(Sec. 146) Revises requirements for the airport security program, including to increase the allotment of discretionary funds in a fiscal year for such program.
Limits award of a grant, contract, or another agreement to a nonprofit consortium that: (1) is composed of public and private persons, including an airport sponsor; and (2) has at least 10 years of demonstrated experience in testing and evaluating anti-terrorist technologies at airports.
(Sec. 147) Sunsets the pilot program for the purchase of airport development rights on September 30, 2008.
(Sec. 148) Extends through FY2012 the grant authority for compatible land use planning and projects by state and local governments.
(Sec. 149) Repeals the September 30, 2009, sunset of the Secretary's authority to approve an application of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) for AIP grants and PFC imposition.
(Sec. 150) Amends the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act to extend through FY2012 the Secretary's authority to fund airport development at the Midway Island Airport.
(Sec. 151) Requires minimum supplemental apportionments to Puerto Rico for airport development projects.
(Sec. 153) Directs the Secretary to encourage airport sponsors and state and local officials, in the development of their airport master plans, to consider as additional goals customer convenience, airport ground access, and access to airport facilities.<br>
<b>Title II: Next Generation Air Transportation System and Air Traffic Control Modernization - </b>(Sec. 201) Expresses the sense of Congress that the modernizing of the U.S. air transportation system, through implementation of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen), is a national priority.
(Sec. 202) Amends the Vision 100-Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act to make the director of the NextGen Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) the Associate Administrator for the NextGen within the FAA, to be appointed by the FAA Administrator.
Specifies additional responsibilities for the JPDO.
Requires NextGen partner federal agencies to designate senior officials to carry out NextGen activities at their respective agencies.
Requires the integrated NextGen plan to include a multiagency integrated work plan containing certain elements, including an outline of the activities of partner federal agencies required to achieve the end-state architecture.
Requires the JPDO to coordinate NextGen activities with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Authorizes appropriations to the JPDO through FY2012.
(Sec. 203) Requires the Next Generation Air Transportation Senior Policy Committee to meet at least twice each year. Directs the Secretary to report annually to Congress on progress made by NextGen partner federal agencies in implementing the NextGen integrated work plan.
(Sec. 204) Requires the FAA Administrator to report to Congress on the FAA program and the schedule for integrating automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) technology into the national airspace system.
(Sec. 205) Requires the FAA Administrator to: (1) include certain stakeholders in the planning, development, and deployment of air traffic control modernization projects (including the NextGen); and (2) collaborate with qualified employees selected by each exclusive collective bargaining representative of FAA employees who are likely to be impacted by such planning, development, and deployment.
(Sec. 206) Requires the Comptroller General to review and report to Congress on the progress and challenges: (1) associated with transforming the U.S. Air traffic control system into the NextGen; and (2) related to the acquisition of designated technologies and the development of procedures for the NextGen System.<br>
(Sec. 208) Requires the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation (DOT) to assess and report to specified congressional committees on the effectiveness of FAA oversight of, and reliance on, third party development of flight procedures (including public use procedures) for the national airspace system.
(Sec. 209) Directs the FAA Administrator to arrange with the National Research Council to review and report to Congress on the enterprise architecture for the NextGen System.
(Sec. 210) Directs the FAA Administrator to use funds for FY2010-FY2012 to contribute to the establishment by a public-private partnership of an airport-based testing site for existing NextGen technologies.
(Sec. 213) Grants the FAA Administrator authority to retain as part of its appropriation proceeds from the disposal of FAA property.
(Sec. 215) Authorizes the FAA Administrator to bid competitively to provide air traffic services to aviation authorities abroad, both public and private. (Current law authorizes the FAA to provide such services with or without reimbursement if it determines that providing such services promotes aviation safety).
(Sec. 216) Directs the FAA Administrator to: (1) initiate a study on front line manager staffing requirements in air traffic control facilities; and (2) establish a monitoring system for flight service specialist staffing and training under service contracts for flight service stations.
(Sec. 218) Directs the FAA Administrator to use funds for FY2010-FY2012 to contribute to the establishment of a NextGen research and development (R&D) center of excellence.
(Sec. 219) Authorizes additional appropriations for FY2010-FY2012 to carry out airspace redesign initiatives.
<b>Title III: Safety - Subtitle A: General Provisions - </b>(Sec. 301) Authorizes a person who has been denied an airman certificate by an order of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), or the FAA Administrator if a NTSB order will have a significant adverse impact on the issuance or renewal of airman certificates, to seek judicial review in the appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals.
(Sec 302) Sets forth a process under which the FAA may release to a person seeking to maintain an aircraft's airworthiness, without the consent of an aircraft's owner of record, any data in FAA possession relating to abandoned aircraft type certificates and supplemental aircraft type certificates for an aircraft, engine, propeller, or appliance.
Postpones until January 1, 2014, FAA authority to issue a design organization certificate authorizing a design organization to certify compliance with certain requirements and minimum standards for the type certification of aircraft, aircraft engines, propellers, or appliances.
(Sec. 303) Requires the FAA to: (1) certify to Congress that it has inspected each foreign repair station that has performed work on U.S. Air carrier aircraft or components at least twice in the preceding year, as well as tested persons who perform safety-sensitive functions at such stations for use of alcohol or controlled substances; and (2) continue to hold discussions with foreign countries where such stations are located to ensure harmonization of their safety standards with those of the United States.
(Sec. 304) Requires: (1) the FAA Administrator to report to Congress a plan for the installation and deployment of systems to alert controllers and/or flight crews to potential runway incursions; and (2) the plan to be integrated into the NextGen Implementation Plan document.
(Sec. 305) Requires the FAA Administrator to: (1) issue improved, tamper-resistant pilot licenses that include a photograph and are capable of accommodating a digital photograph, a biometric identifier, or other unique identifier; and (2) develop methods to determine whether a license has been tampered with, altered, or counterfeited.
(Sec. 306) Directs the FAA Administrator to: (1) conclude arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) for a study of pilot fatigue; and (2) study flight attendant fatigue, acting through the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI). Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 307) Requires the FAA Administrator to: (1) prescribe and enforce occupational safety and health standards for flight attendants on board aircraft; and (2) establish within the FAA the position of Cabin Occupational Safety and Health Inspector. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 308) Requires the FAA Administrator to establish a pilot program to provide surveillance for aircraft flying outside of radar coverage in mountainous areas. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 309) Requires the FAA Administrator to review and report to Congress on off-airport, low-altitude weather observation technologies.
(Sec. 310) Requires the FAA Administrator to: (1) issue regulations requiring all covered maintenance work on passenger aircraft to be performed by certain authorized individuals; and (2) develop a plan to identify all noncertified providers that have performed maintenance work on such aircraft. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 311) Requires the FAA Administrator to issue a final rule revising certain federal aircraft rescue and firefighting standards (ARFF) to improve the protection of the traveling public, other persons, aircraft, buildings, and the environment from fires and hazardous materials incidents.
(Sec. 312) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the effectiveness of FAA oversight activities to prevent or mitigate the effects of dense continuous smoke in the cockpit of a commercial aircraft.
(Sec. 313) Directs the FAA to: (1) conduct a rulemaking proceeding to improve the safety of flight crewmembers, medical personnel, and passengers onboard helicopters providing helicopter air ambulance services; (2) require a part 135 certificate holder providing such services to report certain data; and (3) study and report to Congress on the feasibility of requiring helicopter pilots providing such services to use night vision goggles during nighttime operations.
(Sec. 315) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to the Secretary and appropriate congressional committees on the helicopter and fixed-wing air ambulance industry.
<b>Subtitle B: Unmanned Aircraft Systems - </b>(Sec. 321) Requires the Secretary to develop a plan for the safe integration of commercial unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the national airspace system by September 30, 2013. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 322) Requires the Secretary to determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan.
(Sec. 323) Requires the Secretary to issue guidance regarding the operation of public unmanned aircraft systems to expedite the issuance of a certificate of authorization process, and for other specified reasons.
<b>Subtitle C: Safety and Protections -</b> (Sec. 331) Establishes in the FAA an Aviation Safety Whistleblower Investigation Office, which shall receive and assess complaints and information relating to possible violations of aviation safety laws and regulations.
(Sec. 332) Directs the FAA Administrator to modify the FAA customer service initiative, mission and vision statements, as well as other policy statements to: (1) remove any reference to air carriers or other entities regulated by the FAA as "customers"; (2) state that in regulating safety the only FAA customers are individuals traveling on aircraft; and (3) state that air carriers and other entities regulated by the FAA do not have the right to select the FAA employees who will inspect their operations.
(Sec. 333) Prohibits any person holding an air carrier operating certificate from knowingly employing, or contracting with, an individual to act as an agent or representative of the certificate holder in any matter before the FAA if, in the preceding two-year period, the individual: (1) served as, or was responsible for oversight of, an FAA flight standards inspector; and (2) had responsibility to inspect, or oversee inspection of, the operations of the certificate holder.
(Sec. 334) Prohibits any individual serving as a principal FAA supervisory inspector from being responsible for overseeing the operations of a single air carrier for a continuous period of more than five years. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 335) Directs the FAA Administrator to establish a process for the monthly review of the FAA air transportation oversight system database by FAA employees.
(Sec. 336) Requires the FAA Administrator to modify the Voluntary Disclosure Reporting Program to require inspectors to: (1) verify that air carriers implement comprehensive solutions to correct the underlying causes of the violations they have voluntarily disclosed; and (2) confirm, before approving a final report of a disclosed violation, that the violation, or another one occurring under the same circumstances, has not previously been discovered by an inspector or self-disclosed by the air carrier.
Requires the FAA Administrator to establish a process for the review and approval of voluntary self-disclosures received from air carriers.
Requires the DOT Inspector General to study and report to Congress on the Voluntary Disclosure Reporting Program.
<b>Title IV: Air Service Improvements - </b>(Sec. 401) Prohibits an individual from smoking in an aircraft: (1) in scheduled interstate, intrastate, or foreign air passenger transportation; and (2) in nonscheduled intrastate, interstate, or foreign commercial air passenger transportation, if a flight attendant is a required crewmember onboard the aircraft.
(Sec. 402) Requires the Secretary to collect, and publish on the DOT website, data regarding canceled and diverted flights of air carriers.
(Sec. 403) Increases from 24 to 34 the number of slots exempted from certain requirements and regulations prohibiting an air carrier's operation of an aircraft nonstop in air transportation between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and another airport more than 1,250 statute miles away (Perimeter Rule limit).
Increases from three to five the maximum number by which operations at such airport in any one-hour period may be increased under exemptions from the Perimeter Rule and other limits.
Requires the FAA Administrator to reduce the hourly air carrier slot quota for such airport by a total of 10 slots that are available for allocation.
Declares that operations conducted by new entrant air carriers and limited incumbent air carriers shall be afforded a scheduling priority over operations conducted by other air carriers granted exemptions, with the highest scheduling priority to be afforded to beyond-perimeter operations conducted by new entrant air carriers and limited incumbent air carriers.
(Sec. 404) Revises certain guidelines for compensation for continued Essential Air Service (EAS) to small and rural communities. Requires such guidelines to permit the Secretary to: (1) incorporate financial incentives in EAS contracts based on specified performance goals; and (2) execute long-term EAS contracts when in the public interest to do so.
Requires the Secretary within 90 days after enactment of this Act to: (1) issue revised guidelines governing the rate of compensation paid to an air carrier for EAS; and (2) report to Congress on the extent such guidelines have been implemented and the impact, if any, their implementation has had on air carrier performance.<br>
(Sec. 405) Authorizes additional funding out of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund for each fiscal year for the EAS program.
(Sec. 406) Revises certain priorities in the funding of communities under the small community air service development program to give priority in funding to multiple communities that cooperate to submit a regional or multistate application to improve air service under such program. Extends the small community air service development program through FY2012.<br>
(Sec. 407) Requires certain air carriers and airport operators to submit for the Secretary's approval emergency contingency plans for: (1) how food, water, restroom facilities, and access to medical treatment will be provided to passengers who are grounded on aircraft for extended periods without access to the terminal; (2) allowed deplanement of passengers following excessive delays; (3) the sharing of facilities and gates during an airport emergency; and (4) the use of an airport terminal for the processing of passengers arriving on a foreign flight in the case of an excessive tarmac delay.
Requires: (1) the Secretary to establish a consumer complaints hotline telephone number for use by air passengers; and (2) certain air carriers to include on their websites, and on any flight ticket and boarding pass issued to a passenger, such hotline number and other air carrier information, including contact information for the Aviation Consumer Protection Division of the DOT for service complaints. Authorizes appropriations.
Requires: (1) the Secretary to make available to the public a website listing countries that may require an air carrier or foreign air carrier to treat an aircraft passenger cabin with insecticides prior to a flight to the country or to apply an aerosol insecticide when the cabin is occupied with passengers; and (2) an air carrier, foreign air carrier, or ticket agent selling a ticket in the United States for foreign air transportation to a country on the list to disclose on its website or through other means that such country may require the use of insecticides prior or during such flight.
Directs the Secretary to issue regulations to require each air carrier that has at least 1% of the total domestic scheduled-service passenger revenue to provide each air passenger the option to receive from an air carrier a text message or email notification of any change in the flight status before boarding an aircraft.
Sets forth certain penalties.
(Sec. 408) Repeals the requirements that competition plans include patterns of air service and airfare levels.
(Sec. 409) Extends competitive access report requirements for certain airports through FY2012.
(Sec. 410) Prescribes a special rule that, if the Secretary determines that a contract air traffic control tower already operating has a benefit to cost ratio of less than 1.0, the airport sponsor or state or local government having jurisdiction over the airport shall not be required to pay the portion of the costs that exceeds the benefit for a period of 18 months.
Establishes funding levels for FY2010-FY2012 for the air traffic control contract tower program.
Increases the federal share of the cost of construction of a nonapproach control tower under the program.
Directs the Secretary to establish uniform standards and requirements for safety assessments of air traffic control towers that receive funding under such program.
(Sec. 411) Expresses the sense of Congress that each U.S. Air carrier should: (1) establish reduced air fares for all members of the Armed Forces on active duty; and (2) offer flexible terms that allow such members to purchase, modify, or cancel air tickets without time restrictions, fees, and penalties, and waive baggage fees for a minimum of three bags.<br>
(Sec. 412) Repeals the EAS local participation program.
(Sec. 413) Requires an increase in the $200 per passenger EAS subsidy cap to reflect any increase in the cost of aviation fuel. Makes any community that has been determined ineligible for EAS ineligible for such increase.
(Sec. 414) Requires the Secretary to: (1) notify communities before their termination of eligibility for EAS; and (2) establish procedures by which each community notified of an impending loss of subsidy may work directly with an air carrier to ensure that the carrier is able to submit a proposal to the Secretary for EAS to such community for an amount of compensation not exceeding the subsidy cap.
(Sec. 415) Authorizes a state or local government to submit to the Secretary a proposal for restoring EAS subsidies to an air carrier providing EAS to a small community.
(Sec. 416) Establishes within the DOT the Office of Rural Aviation to monitor the status of air service to small communities and develop proposals to improve it.
(Sec. 417) Authorizes the Secretary, subject to the availability of funds, to increase EAS subsidies to air carriers on an expedited basis paid to compensate for increased aviation fuel costs.
(Sec. 418) Requires the Inspector General of DOT to conduct a review of air carrier flight delays, cancellations, and associated causes to update its 2000 report entitled "Audit of Air Carrier Flight Delays and Cancellations."
(Sec. 419) Requires the Comptroller General to evaluate and compare, for a report to Congress, European Union (EU) and U.S. rules on compensation offered to air passengers who are denied boarding or whose flights are canceled or delayed.
(Sec. 420) Establishes an advisory committee for aviation consumer protection.
(Sec. 421) Directs the Secretary evaluate the amount provided for denied boarding compensation and issue a regulation to adjust it as necessary.
(Sec. 422) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on compensation for delayed baggage.
(Sec. 423) Directs the FAA Administrator to convene a conference of air carriers to reduce, on a voluntary basis, the number of their aircraft operations during any hour at an airport to less than the maximum departure and arrival rate if: (1) such operations exceed the hourly maximum departure and arrival rate established by the FAA; and (2) such excess operations are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the national or regional airspace system.
(Sec. 424) Expands the kinds of circumstances for mandatory DOT airline consumer complaint investigations.
(Sec. 425) Prohibits voice communications by individuals using mobile communications devices on scheduled air flights, unless they are flight crew members, flight attendants, or federal law enforcement officers.
(Sec. 426) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on DOT legal requirements and policies for deciding whether to approve cooperative agreements between an air carrier and a foreign air carrier (international alliances) to provide foreign air transportation, as well as exempt such alliances from the U.S. antitrust laws.
(Sec. 427) Requires an air carrier to permit an air passenger to carry a musical instrument on a passenger aircraft without charge if it can be stowed in accordance with FAA requirements for carryon baggage or cargo. Sets forth requirements for the carriage of musical instruments as checked baggage or as occupants of a purchased seat.<br>
<b>Title V: Environmental Stewardship and Streamlining - </b>(Sec. 501) Amends air tour management program requirements to exempt from them a national park that has 50 or fewer commercial air tour flights a year.
Authorizes the Director of the National Park Service and the FAA Administrator, as an alternative to an air tour management plan, to enter into a voluntary agreement with a commercial air tour operator to manage commercial air tour operations over a national park.
(Sec. 502) Requires federal agencies (except the FAA) that issue approvals, licenses, or permits to states for projects under the AIP State Block Grant Program to use adequate state environmental review analyses.
(Sec. 503) Authorizes the FAA Administrator to accept funds from an airport sponsor to hire additional staff or obtain the services of consultants to conduct: (1) special environmental studies related to an airport project; (2) special studies or reviews to support approved noise compatibility measures; or (3) special studies or reviews to support environmental mitigation in an FAA record of decision or finding of no significant impact.<br>
(Sec. 504) Authorizes the Secretary to make a grant to an airport operator to assist in completing environmental review and assessment activities for proposals to implement flight procedures at an airport that has been approved as part of an airport noise compatibility program.
(Sec. 505) Sets forth requirements with respect to the determination of the fair market value of residential properties acquired for soundproofing purposes under an airport development project.
(Sec. 506) Authorizes the Secretary to make airport planning and development and noise compatibility planning and development program grants to an airport operator and unit of local government to carry out noise mitigation projects for certain residential buildings in the noise impacted area surrounding an airport if: (1) the buildings are adversely affected by airport noise; and (2) certain other requirements are met.
Directs the Secretary to establish criteria to determine which residences in the 65 DNL (Noise Contour) area (near O'Hare Airport, Chicago, Illinois) suffer the greatest noise impact.
(Sec. 507) Directs the FAA Administrator to enter into a cooperative agreement with an institution, entity, or consortium to carry out a program to develop CLEEN (continuous lower energy, emissions, and noise) engine and airframe technology for aircraft over the next 10 years. Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2012.
(Sec. 508) Prohibits, after December 31, 2013, the operation of any civil subsonic turbojet of 75,000 pounds or less operating out of airports in the continental United States unless such aircraft complies with stage three noise levels, with specified exceptions.
(Sec. 509) Directs the Secretary to: (1) establish a pilot program to carry out environmental mitigation demonstration projects at up to six public-use airports; and (2) carry out a pilot program at up to five public-use airports to design, develop, and test new air traffic flow management technology to better manage the flow of aircraft on the ground and reduce ground holds and idling times for aircraft.
(Sec. 511) Requires the FAA, to the maximum extent possible, to implement environmentally-beneficial practices for new construction and major renovation of FAA air traffic control facilities. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 512) Directs the FAA Administrator to make arrangements for the National Academy of Public Administration or another qualified independent entity to review whether it is desirable to locate regulatory responsibility for establishment of engine noise and emissions standards for civil aircraft within the FAA or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
(Sec. 513) Requires the FAA Administrator to initiate research and development (R&D) on effective air cleaning and sensor technology for the engine and auxiliary power unit for bleed air supplied to the passenger cabin and flight deck of a pressurized aircraft. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 514) Expresses the sense of Congress that the EU should work with other contracting states of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to develop a consensual approach to addressing aircraft greenhouse gas emissions through the ICAO.
(Sec. 515) Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey should undertake an airport noise compatibility planning study for airports it operates, with particular attention to the impact of noise on neighborhoods surrounding LaGuardia Airport, Newark Liberty Airport, and JFK Airport.
(Sec. 516) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on whether the FAA and the Massachusetts Port Authority are complying with the requirements of the FAA's record of decision dated August 2, 2002.
(Sec. 517) Directs the FAA Administrator to conduct a rulemaking proceeding to determine whether Westchester County Airport (New York) should be authorized to limit aircraft operations between the hours of 12 a.m. and 6:30 a.m.
(Sec. 518) Requires an owner or operator of a large hub airport to publish on its website a telephone number to receive aviation noise complaints related to the airport.
<b>Title VI: FAA Employees and Organization - </b>(Sec. 601) Declares that, in disputes arising between the FAA Administrator and its employees, in attempting to reach an agreement concerning the implementation of proposed changes to the FAA personnel management system: (1) the services of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) shall be used; and (2) the Administrator and employee bargaining representative may by mutual agreement adopt alternative procedures for the resolution of disputes or impasses arising in the negotiation of a collective-bargaining agreement.
Requires the negotiating parties, if the services of the FMCS do not lead to an agreement, to submit their controversy to the Federal Service Impasses Panel for binding arbitration. (Currently, the services of the FMCS shall be used and, if the services of the FMCS do not lead to an agreement, the Administrator's proposed change to the personnel management system shall not take effect until 60 days have elapsed after the Administrator has transmitted to Congress the proposed changes, along with the objections of the employees to the changes, and the reasons for such objections.)
Provides that any proposed changes implemented by the FAA on and after July 10, 2005, without the agreement of the exclusive bargaining representative of the FAA employees, shall be null and void, and the parties shall: (1) be governed by their last mutual agreement; and (2) resume negotiations until a new contract is adopted. States that, if an agreement is not reached within 45 days after negotiations resume, then the dispute shall be submitted to Federal Service Impasses Panel for binding arbitration.
Makes eligible for back pay any FAA employees subject to changes that have been declared null and void. Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 602) Applies to the FAA personnel management system certain federal civil service merit system principles, prohibited personnel practices, and requirements for back pay due to an unjustified personnel actions.
(Sec. 604) Requires: (1) the Comptroller General to study and report to specified congressional committees on the training of FAA airway transportation systems specialists; and (2) the FAA Administrator to make arrangements with the NAS to assess FAA assumptions and methods used to determine FAA systems specialist staffing needs.
(Sec. 605) Requires the Comptroller General to report to Congress on the status of GAO recommendations in its October 2004 report entitled "Aviation Safety: FAA Needs to Strengthen Management of Its Designee Programs."
(Sec. 606) Requires the FAA Administrator to: (1) develop by October 31, 2009, a staffing model, following specified recommendations, for aviation safety inspectors; and (2) increase the number of safety critical positions (aviation safety inspectors, safety technical specialists, and operations support positions) in the FAA's Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service. Authorizes appropriations for both requirements, indefinitely for the first, through FY2012 for the second.
(Sec. 608) Requires the FAA Administrator to: (1) arrange with the NAS to study and report to specified congressional committees on the assumptions and methods used by the FAA to estimate staffing needs for FAA air traffic controllers; (2) assess and report to specified congressional committees on the adequacy of FAA air traffic controller training programs; and (3) study and report to specified congressional committees on training options for graduates of the Collegiate Training Initiative (CTI) program.
(Sec. 611) Establishes the FAA Task Force on Air Traffic Control Facility Conditions to study and report to certain congressional committees on specified matters relating to air traffic control facilities. Authorizes appropriations.
<b>Title VII: Aviation Insurance - </b>(Sec. 701) Extends the termination dates for existing policies of insurance and reinsurance against loss or damage arising out of any risk from the operation of a domestic or foreign aircraft. Extends from FY2009 through FY2012 the requirement that the Secretary provide such insurance and reinsurance, and extends from December 31, 2009, through December 31, 2019, the Secretary's authority to provide such insurance.
Establishes a successor aviation insurance program. Requires, after December 31, 2019, that aviation insurance be provided in an airline industry sponsored risk retention or other risk-sharing arrangement. Requires transfer to such a successor program of any premiums collected under the current program.
(Sec. 702) Extends through December 31, 2012, the authority to certify that an air carrier is a victim of an act of terrorism and is liable for damages only as specified.
(Sec. 704) Authorizes the Secretary to use a claims adjuster independent of the underwriting agent to adjust aviation insurance claims.
(Sec. 705) Extends through December 31, 2019, the Secretary's authority to provide aviation insurance.
<b>Title VIII: Miscellaneous</b> - (Sec. 801) Declares that an air carrier shall not be deemed to be under the actual control of U.S. citizens unless U.S. citizens control all matters pertaining to the business and structure of the air carrier, including operational matters such as marketing, branding, fleet composition, route selection, pricing, and labor relations.
(Sec. 802) Exempts from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requirements regarding government records on individuals any FAA disclosures to any federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective service, immigration, or national security official in order to assist the official receiving the information in the performance of official duties.<br>
(Sec. 803) Permits the FAA to access criminal justice information to protect the safety and security of the national airspace system or to support the missions of the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and other law enforcement agencies. Prohibits using such access to conduct criminal investigations.
(Sec. 805) Directs the Secretary to evaluate and report to Congress on the formulation of the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems.
(Sec. 806) Amends the Railway Labor Act to extend coverage only to certain express carrier employees who are in positions eligible for certification under FAA rules and perform duties for such a carrier that are also eligible for such certification. Subjects all other express carrier employees to the National Labor Relations Act.
(Sec. 807) Establishes within the FAA a working group to make recommendations for the realignment of FAA services and facilities to: (1) assist in the transition to next generation facilities; and (2) help reduce costs in instances in which cost reductions can be implemented without adversely affecting safety.
(Sec. 808) Authorizes the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to procure accidental death and dismemberment insurance for its employees who travel for accident investigations under hazardous circumstances.
(Sec. 809) Requires the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on how the FAA can better ensure the cooperation of air carriers and foreign air carriers to develop and enforce child safety control for adults traveling internationally with children.
(Sec. 810) Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) approve the sale of Lost Nation Airport from the city of Willoughby, Ohio, to Lake County, Ohio, provided certain conditions are met; and (2) make a grant to Lake County to assist in its purchase.
(Sec. 811) Directs the FAA Administrator to: (1) approve the request of the town of Pollock, Louisiana, to close the Pollock Municipal Airport as a public airport; and (2) release the town from any condition contained in a surplus property conveyance or transfer document.
(Sec. 812) Requires the FAA Administrator to develop a human intervention and motivation study program to help combat chemical dependency of pilots and flight attendants involved in air carrier operations. Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2012.
(Sec. 813) Requires the FAA Administrator to submit to Congress a plan that outlines changes to the Washington, D.C., Air Defense Identification Zone that will decrease operational impacts and improve general aviation access to airports in the region.
(Sec. 814) Releases certain Merrill Field Airport land, without monetary consideration, to the town of Anchorage, Alaska, for construction or reconstruction of a federally subsidized highway project.
(Sec. 815) Expresses the sense of Congress that the nation: (1) supports the goals and ideals of the 1940 Air Terminal Museum located at William P. Hobby Airport, Houston, Texas; and (2) congratulates the city of Houston and the 1940 Air Terminal Museum on the 80-year history of William P. Hobby Airport and the role the airport plays in Houston and the nation's transportation system.
(Sec. 816) Directs the FAA Administrator to initiate a rulemaking proceeding regarding flight time and duty limitations for flight crewmembers.
(Sec. 817) Establishes a pilot program at up to four public-use airports with an approved noise compatibility program for redevelopment of airport property. Makes the federal share of allowable project costs 80%.
(Sec. 818) Requires the FAA Administrator to study and report to Congress on: (1) helicopter operations over Long Island and Staten Island, New York; and (2) whether onboard temperature standards are necessary to protect cabin and cockpit crew members and passengers on an aircraft from excessive heat during standard operations or during an excessive flight delay.
(Sec. 821) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on effective strategies to alleviate congestion at airports during peak travel times.
(Sec. 822) Requires the Secretary to issue regulations to require air carriers to provide training for flight attendants and gate attendants about serving alcohol, dealing with disruptive passengers, and recognizing intoxicated persons.
(Sec. 823) Requires the FAA Administrator to study and report to specified congressional committees on the feasibility of developing a public website on wind turbine installation and the level of obstruction such turbines may present to aviation sites.
(Sec. 824) Directs the FAA Administrator to study and report to Congress on: (1) the locations of FAA radar signals in the United States, including their impact on the development and installation of renewable energy technologies, such as wind turbines; (2) wind turbine lighting systems; and (3) a physical means, or combination of physical and procedural means, to limit access to flight decks of all-cargo aircraft to authorized flight crew members.
(Sec. 826) Prohibits the Secretary from using funds to name, rename, designate, or redesignate any project or program under this Act for a serving Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, or Senator of Congress.
(Sec. 828) Expresses the sense of Congress that FAA whistleblowers be granted the full protection of the law.
(Sec. 829) Directs the FAA Administrator to designate the proposed College Point Marine Transfer Station in New York City, New York, as a hazard to air navigation.
(Sec. 830) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on commercial airline pilot training and certification programs.
(Sec. 831) Authorizes the Secretary, subject to specified conditions, to release restrictions on the use of certain property conveyed to the city of St. George, Utah, for airport purposes.
(Sec. 832) Directs the FAA Administrator to take action to ensure that any subsequent air traffic control tower or facility that replaces an existing tower or facility placed into operation before September 30, 2009, at Palm Beach International Airport includes an operating terminal radar approach control.
(Sec. 833) Expresses the sense of Congress that the FAA Administrator should enter into good faith discussions with the city of Santa Monica, California, to achieve runway safety area solutions to safety concerns at Santa Monica Airport that are consistent with FAA design guidelines.
<b>Title IX: Federal Aviation Research and Development - </b>Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2009 - (Sec. 903) Directs the FAA Administrator to establish: (1) a research initiative to assess the impact of aviation on the climate and to evaluate approaches to mitigate such impact; (2) a program of research grants to universities and nonprofit research foundations for research and technology demonstrations to improve runway surfaces; (3) a research program on methods to improve certification of new technologies for introduction into the national airspace system; (4) a permanent airport cooperative research program; and (5) a research grant program involving colleges and universities to conduct research by undergraduate students on subjects of relevance to the FAA.
(Sec. 906) Increases the federal share of costs of establishing and operating regional centers of air transportation excellence and related research activities. Sets the federal share of costs for an individual grant to an institution of higher education to establish and operate such a center at no more than 90%.
(Sec. 908) Requires the FAA Administrator to conduct or supervise specified research to develop technologies and methods to assess the risk of and prevent defects, failures, and malfunctions in all classes of unmanned aircraft systems.
(Sec. 910) Requires the FAA Administrator to continue R&D into technologies to modify aviation piston engines to operate with unleaded aviation fuel. Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2012.
(Sec. 911) Requires the FAA Administrator to arrange for the National Research Council to review FAA energy- and environment-related research programs and FAA aviation safety-related research programs. Authorizes additional FY2010 appropriations for the latter program.
(Sec. 913) Directs the Secretary to establish a research grant program to develop technologies that produce jet fuel from alternative sources. Requires the FAA Administrator to designate one of the participating educational or research institutions a Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuel Research.
(Sec. 914) Directs the FAA Administrator to establish a Center for Excellence in Aviation Employment. Authorizes appropriations.
<b>Title X: Airport and Airway Trust Fund Financing </b>- Airport and Airway Trust Fund Financing Act of 2009 - (Sec. 1002) Amends the Internal Revenue Code to (1) impose an excise tax on aviation-grade kerosene of 35.9 cents per gallon (4.3 cents per gallon for commercial aviation uses); (2) increase to 24.1 cents per gallon the tax rate for aviation gasoline; and (3) extend through FY2012 the excise tax on the transportation by air of persons and property and the excise tax on aviation gasoline and aviation-grade kerosene.
Extends through FY2012 the expenditure authority for the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.
Dedicates revenues from the taxes imposed on aviation gasoline and aviation-grade kerosene to carry out air traffic control modernization.
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 6/1/2009: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Points in Favor
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
Points Against
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
(read more ↓)
[707 views]
Cost per :
Learn More
See Related Bills:
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Administrative law and regulatory procedures, Advanced technology and technological innovations, Advisory bodies, Air quality, Alaska, Atmospheric science and weather, Aviation and airports, Broadcasting, cable, digital technologies, California, Child safety and welfare, Civil actions and liability, Climate change, Congressional oversight, Consumer affairs, Crimes against children, Criminal justice information and records, Department of Transportation, District of Columbia, Drug, alcohol, tobacco use, Education programs funding, Employment and training programs, Employment discrimination and employee rights, Energy efficiency and conservation, Energy prices, Energy research, Environmental assessment, monitoring, research, European Union, Executive agency funding and structure, Fires, Foreign aid and international relief, Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management, Government ethics and transparency, public corruption, Government information and archives, Government investigations, Government trust funds, Hazardous wastes and toxic substances, Higher education, Illinois, International organizations and cooperation, Judicial review and appeals, Labor standards, Land transfers, Land use and conservation, Licensing and registrations, Life, casualty, property insurance, Louisiana, Marshall Islands, Maryland, Massachusetts, Micronesia, Military personnel and dependents, Minority education, Motor fuels, Museums, exhibitions, cultural centers, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), New Jersey, New York City, New York State, Noise pollution, Oceania, Ohio, Palau, Parks, recreation areas, trails, Pedestrians and bicycling, Public contracts and procurement, Puerto Rico, Research administration and funding, Research and development, Rural conditions and development, Sales and excise taxes, Small business, Solid waste and recycling, State and local taxation, Telephone and wireless communication, Terrorism, Texas, Transportation and public works, Transportation costs, Transportation employees, Transportation programs funding, Transportation safety and security, Travel and tourism, User charges and fees, Veterans' education, employment, rehabilitation, Virginia, Water quality, Worker safety and health (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
Transportation, Income Security, Tax and Revenue
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)










Visitor Comments
svr111
February 12, 2009, 11:53pm (report abuse)We need this bill to pass in full. It is for the safety, integrity of the flying public. It is for the keeping the most qualified peole in the positions that really keep the flying public safe. It is for true negotiations between a working force and their archaic employer.
Mark
March 1, 2009, 1:57pm (report abuse)It is ludicrous that us controllers are working under imposed work rules and not a contract. This bill needs to pass immediately and get the FAA back on track as far as a govt agency, do the right thing!!
Mark
April 2, 2009, 3:34pm (report abuse)This bill does NOT need to pass "in full". The nonsense about the RLA at the end is simply something UPS has lobbied in hopes of wiping out its competition. Remove that piece, and you can have the rest.
David2
April 27, 2009, 10:23am (report abuse)I don't think the cost per family is really accurate since most of the money to fund the bill comes from a ticket tax on airline passengers. If you and your family don't fly, your cost is much less.
Winger
May 3, 2009, 9:51pm (report abuse)I agree Mark. The RLA attachment is typical Washington politics. This is a great bill and the lobbyist for the Teamsters (and funded by UPS) have donated millions to taint this bill for their own selfish means. This bill is about airline safety. Yet it is going to get bottled up because of a trucking company!
C.S
May 4, 2009, 4:18pm (report abuse)I work for Fedex Express and it is stupid for us delivery drivers to fall under the RLA and I hope we get properly placed under the NLRA.Truck drivers and delivery drivers have no place being classified as aviation workers.IF we get placed under the NLRA then Fedex will have to pay us comparable wages to UPS. Right now I make $15.29 an hr while UPS drivers make around $30 an hr.Now does everyone see why Fedex wants to keep us under the RLA?
D.H.
May 7, 2009, 11:30am (report abuse)The way I understand Section 806 of H.R. 915, the amendment will appropriately provide equal treatment under labor law to employees performing the same functions at different companies, and will eliminate the special treatment currently given to one company over the other. This is about a level playing field for two fine companies. Let's give them a chance to fairly and equally compete in the marketplace. That's what America is all about.
SH
May 25, 2009, 6:31pm (report abuse)C.S - nice try but you are comparing starting wages at FedEx with top wages at UPS! FedEx Express IS an airline (one of the largest in the world). If the couriers who carry air freight are not airline employees then neither are ticket agents for United Airlines. UPS is a trucking company that added air freight to it's system. FedEx Express hasn't changed. It is still primarily an air freight company. FedEx Ground, which is an entirely separate company, competes more head-to-head with UPS and is not effected by this bill.
BH
May 26, 2009, 7:03pm (report abuse)SH Thats not entirely true. The only difference is that UPS drivers pick up ground and air packages while FedEx Express pick up only air. They both do delivers and pickups for air specific packages and should be held to the same rules. Oh, and in case your curious, FedEx is the top for freight airlines and one of the largest airlines in the world. UPS is also on the top 15 list and would be right up there with FedEx if they owned all their own small planes. FedEx has 672 planes including prop and local area, UPS has 262 but that is only jets, all small planes are leased.
C.S.
June 2, 2009, 8:07pm (report abuse)I am not comparing starting wages. I started out at 12.59 and 6 years later I make a whopping 15.29 per hr.We do compete head to head with UPS because when they upgrade service in a certain area, what do we do?Of course, we upgrade service too.The only thing we don't compete with UPS on is compensation for couriers and once this bill passes the senate we will force fedex to compete with that too.
Palj
June 7, 2009, 1:09pm (report abuse)Mark(aka Winger)
How long have you been a manager at Fedex? lol
The Bill will pass.
Deal with it.
"The Tiiimes They r-a-Chayynngin"
Hodger
June 9, 2009, 11:11am (report abuse)C.S. Then go work for UPS. Who is MAKING you work for FedEx. This Bill won't get through the Senate (again) as is. It will be modified and most likely the peice that UPS has lobbied for will get removed.
C.S.
June 9, 2009, 11:23am (report abuse)Hodger, we live in a democracy and I have every right to my opinion.I plan on sticking it out at Fedex in hopes things will change for the better and I will continue to voice my opinion.If you have a problem with that, then move to China or Russia.
TTop92
June 10, 2009, 9:31am (report abuse)My hubby works at Fed Ex. I am an RN and grew up in a Union family. I HATE the UNIONS. The times are a-changin' for sure - - but GOING BACKWARDS!!!!!!!! All the unions do is impose wages on the employers who are trying to run a business. So, the usaually high school educated TRUCK driver makes $30 an hour. That screws the COLLEGE educated IT guy, Engineer and the other people that WORK ionthe OFFICE building tryingto run the business to keep your SORRY ASS on the road. OR did your forget about that?????? Those "managers" you talk about, take care of the LOGISTICS that you depend on so that your packages are there for your pick up and delivery. So, who's more worthy of $30 an hour. My Husband is, not you!!
C.S.
June 10, 2009, 2:51pm (report abuse)If it wasn't for the drivers your husbands sorry ass wouldn't have a job either. Doesn't there have to be a work force, in order to have something to manage?
Palj
June 10, 2009, 9:06pm (report abuse)"All unions do is impose wages on the employers" LOL, Is she for real?....How bout IMPOSE, FAIRNESS.
Most of the 'truck drivers" I work with DO have a college degrees, including me Missy.
"That screws the IT guy"
Have your IT guys work for another company then. Hey, maybe they can work in your hospital and monitor your 3 day work week, and maybe teach you and your divorced nurse pals to spell correctly...ie."USUALLY"
Have you "Hubby" speak for himself.
b carter
June 11, 2009, 12:28am (report abuse)I watched as my former company, Emery Air Freight was run out of business due to the Teamsters inflated wages and prohibitive work rules that made it impossible for them to compete. I negotiated with ARMED Teamster Local management which threatened strikes, used intimidation on its own employees (not to mention management), beat them up on occasion, shot up our warehouses on occasion, and would not allow us to stress productivity in our negotiotions.
The end result was Emery was forced to go out of business as they could no longer remain competitive with FedEx. I then worked for FedEx for over 23 years and saw first hand what a great company could do with motivated well compensated employees.
The Teamsters are for loosers who can't or won't make it on there own initiative and have to rely on outside tough guys to do their heavy lifting.
FedEx Express is an airline with a pick-up & delivery service on each end and should be organized as they are, as an airline.
Unionman
June 11, 2009, 9:38am (report abuse)How do you consider a delivery driver that bust their ass everyday only to make $15.29 per hr well compensated???
April66
June 11, 2009, 1:47pm (report abuse)I work for UPS. I am not Union, I hate the union. UPS is not the problem. Why does Fedex say they will have to raise their rates. This is a 'legal' change not a monetary one.
And for the 'wife', all jobs depend on each other. I appreciate the man that dumps my trash can, he is no less worthy of his 12.00 an hour than the lady filing my charts.
The bill should pass, not to hurt Fedex, but to even the playing field. Have you checked our profits....UPS is doing well.
Thank you.
EvanH
June 11, 2009, 10:36pm (report abuse)Anyone not read the "Specifies FAA services for which user fees may be charged" part of this for us private pilots?
Prime8
June 12, 2009, 3:09pm (report abuse)FedEx and UPS package handlers perform the same jobs. They pick-up, sort and deliver packages. We're not talking the pilots or air ramp employee's. They should be under the same labor laws.
FedEx just has to do it under two different brands Express and Ground. UPS does it together. Both have airplanes, both have trucks. Both deliver letters and parcels.
I have to agree with DH: This is about a level playing field for two fine companies. Let's give them a chance to fairly and equally compete in the marketplace.
MrtMlt
June 12, 2009, 6:15pm (report abuse)Any individual should avoid the Teamsters at all costs. All their lobbying did'nt help from recent job loss at UPS did they, more on the way! If FedEx ever became union, they better stay clear of the corupted Teamsters.
BigFish
June 12, 2009, 6:20pm (report abuse)UPS and the Teamsters are showing their true colors. PORK BELLYING at the finest. Should either be trusted to work for?, or to have represent you? I think NOT!
Palj
June 14, 2009, 4:07pm (report abuse)Speaking of "true colors"...I believe, based on the Fedex website, BrownBailout..., that
Mr. Smith's true colors are being exposed for all the business world to see.
Courier
June 16, 2009, 9:10pm (report abuse)Fedex has done all they can to ensure that a union can not take hold, from classifying FedexGround employees as independent contractors to using an antiquated law to classify them as an airline. I have worked at Fedex for 10 years as a courier and so far I have lost my pension, lost the company match for my 401K and been denied a raise while Fedex continues to support golf tournaments and racing teams.
Alfonso
June 16, 2009, 10:21pm (report abuse)UPS has enough of the market. Why in gods name would they want more of the market share. UPS/Teamsters leave FedEx alone. Jimmy Hoffa what qualifications does this guys have. Pfffft. Unions are no longer needed.
goguy
June 16, 2009, 10:24pm (report abuse)UPS tried to go under RLA in 1996 and failed. Sooooo now they try this way to get the "trusted" haa haa teamsters to go after FedEx. There is a reason why FedEx is been on the best places to work list for the past 12 years. They done treat their people like UPS.
Gregg
June 16, 2009, 10:31pm (report abuse)Check out jimmy hoffa on youtube say in a "Organize FedEx" campaign meeting. This dope actually says he is excited about the day he sees all the packages out of the whitehouse picked up by UPS. Not to smart Jimmy,,Hummm your in a FedEx meeting...what a dope.
Palj
June 17, 2009, 4:03pm (report abuse)I agree, Unions should not be needed in todays world...However,
as long as there are companys like Fedex and CEO's like Fred Smith, they will flourish.
And as far as the surveys that declare Fedex as one of the"best places to work"....its an OLD survey!...its a modern day sweatshop.
gregg
June 18, 2009, 1:53pm (report abuse)sweatshop. My brother works there and far from it. Teamsters are hurting for membership thats why they are coming after FedEx. As for survey, its done yearly my friend..nice try. Lets see Fred Smith or Jimmy Hoffa hmmmm what qualifications does jimmy hoffa have a corrupt last name. UPS is the sweatshop.
Courier
June 18, 2009, 8:05pm (report abuse)Gregg, If your brother works at Fedex you should know that the company is ripe for unionization. There is really nothing else they can take away from us at this point. My pension losses alone will ensure that I lose almost $3000 per month in retirement. This is retirement that I busted my ass to earn. If Fedex is such a great place to work then they should have nothing to worry about! Let us vote on the union, not Fred Smith and his Board of Directors.
CourierII
June 19, 2009, 6:03pm (report abuse)This has nothing to do with aviation! The Teamsters spent
alot of money and effort to the current sitting President. Now they want payback! Pure and simple!
It is my opinion that Unions are outdated. If you are not happy with a non-union shop, there is always work somewhere else.
gregg
June 20, 2009, 11:57am (report abuse)Pension is a problem for every company with costs. Look at the central states pension that went broke under administration of the unions. I have article after article of people indicted because of missmanagement of the unions. At least FedEx is funded 86%. Again the teamsters are hurt. Let me ask you this Why would UPS try and apply for RLA cert in 1996?? You have not answered that. Teamsters said absolutely not....answer the question.
Prime8
June 24, 2009, 1:42pm (report abuse)Some folks seem to miss the point. When companies do the same thing - in this case pickup sort and deliver packages - they should be treated the same and work under the same labor laws. That is the point of the revision in the bill. Fedex is the ONLY company in the transportation industry (that means not just UPS) covered by the RLA. If UPS tried to get under that labor agreement in 1996 it's because they wanted to be on a level playing field with their major competitor.
Obfusc8
June 24, 2009, 1:46pm (report abuse)As far as unions are concerned, UPS drivers have the highest wages and best benefits in the industry and UPS still makes money.
It seems that if FedEx is so concerned with the possibility of unionization, then maybe their employees are not being treated all that well. If the employees are truly happy with their working conditions, their current and retirement benefits and their pay, then a union vote from the workers would be a simple “No.” If not, then maybe the employees aren't all that happy with their working conditions after all.
Wake Up
June 28, 2009, 12:06am (report abuse)UPS has one of the longest pay progressions, so the so called high pay never does pays off. Work several years for peanuts then spend the rest of your career trying to make it up. Real good deal if you start there when you are 12!
Good Book
June 28, 2009, 12:11am (report abuse)"Confessions of a Union Buster" basically sums up that the awful companies that don't meet the basic 3 people fundamentals will always have the need for a union. Why else would one pay dues from their hard earned check? And how long has UPS had their badly needed union? pretty much says it all!
Not Anti Union
June 28, 2009, 12:15am (report abuse)As Union membership clearly has been and will continue to be reduced, one must consider the fact that Companies may be better meeting the needs of their employees without the need for a Union. Therfore the reduction in overall Union Membership Nationwide may not actually be such a bad thing. Think about it.
gregg
June 30, 2009, 7:58pm (report abuse)Prime your missing the point we are not the same companies. UPS is grouuuuuuuund we are express. We are the same only with our ground division and no one is arguing that. BUt express, i dont see airplanes delivering to peoples homes. 90 percent of express is flown and time sensitive, something UPS does not do even to this day. And by the way level playing field, UPS market cap is 64 billion Fedex 17 billion. Dude lets face it UPS just wants to monopolize period. they are not hurting for money they just want to hurt for more.
gregg
June 30, 2009, 8:01pm (report abuse)and by the way all the Union supporters, can someone finally answer the question what qualification Jimmy Hoffa has????? I cant wait to hear this one. Only one i can think of is he has not be indicted in last 15 years so he's on a roll.
Prime8
July 6, 2009, 9:29am (report abuse)Gregg - do you realize that UPS has an airline division just like FedEx. In fact UPS delivers more packages overnight on time in the US as anyone (yes some are done through their ground network). UPS also delivers overnight (premium) by 8:30 and 10:30 to more businesses and ZIP codes than FedEx. Those are facts. But it's not those facts that need debated.
The point is both companies deliver ground packages and both companies have airlines and deliver premium packages. FedEx started as an airline and now delivers ground packages. UPS started as a ground delivery company and now delivers air packages. They are both transportation companies. All transportation companies (not just UPS or FedEx) should be treated the same and have the same labor laws applied to them to be on a level playing field.
BL
July 6, 2009, 5:45pm (report abuse)Hey Palj: Regarding your message (June 10, 2009, 9:06pm), I guess you don't have a college degree. Your use of "i.e." is incorrect. Shouldn't it be "e.g."? Also, your punctuation needs correction. My two-cents.
Cheers,
Bill
Mark
July 8, 2009, 1:16pm (report abuse)Also this bill does not FORCE fedex to unionize, so wake up. It allows the workers of fedex to chose whether or not to join a union. If they are treated so well then why are you worried? You are worried because they are treated like crap. This bill will pass and its up to the hard working people at fedex to decided.
WTD
July 9, 2009, 5:23am (report abuse)This bill has nothing to do with whether or not FedEx should unionize. I work for UPS, and see no reason for there to be a union, but once again, that is not what this bill is about. The reason it should go through, is that there is an uneven playing field between the 2 companies. FedEx drivers have nothing to do with Airlines, other than they drive the packages that are shipped by air. UPS drivers do the same thing, yet are held under different guidelines. Yes, the teamsters might be pushing for this to try and hurt FedEx, but it only makes sense. Fast food places use the same labor laws, whether their burgers are fried or flame broiled. TV shows and movies use the same rating systems whether they are foreign or domestic. FedEx and UPS should have the same guidelines and rules for doing the same job.
WTD
July 9, 2009, 5:36am (report abuse)And what is with all of the Jimmy Hoffa bashing?(gregg) Jimmy Hoffa was a powerful negotiator. When he had to argue for something, he usually got his way. Hoffa did a great thing when he started, what turned into, one of the strongest unions in the country. As for his qualifications? He worked for a food warehouse during the great depression, where workers had to show up for 12 hour shifts, but were only paid for the time they were loading or unloading trucks. They were not being paid when waiting for trucks to arrive, but could not leave until their 12 hours were up. If there were only 5 trucks to load/unload, that was all you got paid for...even though you had to be there for 12 hours. The man LIVED through unfair wages/hours/working conditions, and fought for a change. There are his qualifications.
sWI
July 9, 2009, 3:10pm (report abuse)I agree that this bill should not be passed in full. Say NO TO CORPORATE GREED!!!
TNT
July 9, 2009, 6:21pm (report abuse)If Fedex is so great to work for then why are their pilots unionized and their other employees not even allowed the opportunity to decide one way or the other?
TNT
July 9, 2009, 6:31pm (report abuse)My hubby works at Fed Ex. I am an RN and grew up in a Union family. I HATE the UNIONS. The times are a-changin' for sure - - but GOING BACKWARDS!!!!!!!! All the unions do is impose wages on the employers who are trying to run a business. So, the usaually high school educated TRUCK driver makes $30 an hour. That screws the COLLEGE educated IT guy, Engineer and the other people that WORK ionthe OFFICE building tryingto run the business to keep your SORRY ASS on the road.
This is great coming from a RN! Honey your industry is bankrupting this country as any company that provides health insurance can attest to. Say what you want about unionized companies but I would argue that they look out for the health and welfare of their members better than non-union companies like Fedex. That is pretty hard to do when you consider how bloated the medical industry has become...What we need is more competition in the medical field!
coniferman
July 10, 2009, 4:52pm (report abuse)If you are talking about the qualifications of Hoffa,Jr. ( the current president of the Teamsters)he is a lawyer with a specialty in labor law.
farronfolbright
(logged in user) July 11, 2009, 6:46am (report abuse)WOW!! What a "thread". Unfortunately, this "situation", "problem", "revision", or whatever word is being used to identify the request to modify the language within a specific area of The Railway Labor Act aka, The RLA (originally written in 1926) will not be resolved so simply. The perceived purpose of the revision, in this particular case, UPS, Inc. whining because FedEx Express gets to be a part of The Railway Labor Act and they're stuck with the stupid National Labor Relations Act aka, The NLRA (originally written in 1946).
I could be wrong (about everything. You don't know me, I could be here for the sole purpose of creating and spreading disinformation, ok actually that would be a dual purpose..............wait, forget that 'cause it's not true.)
farronfolbright
(logged in user) July 11, 2009, 8:42am (report abuse)As I was saying--I could be wrong (except I'm not), but if you're dyslexic you can forget about keeping the facts straight about RLA, NLRA, UPS, FedEx, Ground, Express, Next Day Air and all the other acronyms and abbreviations characteristic to the transportation industry. Even if you're not, or better yet, even if you're a savvy lawyer specializing in labor law, it's doubtful you'll be able to keep the facts straight.
Do you want to know why?
It's a sad truth, maybe cliche', obviously distorted by it's own revelation, BUT, the love of money IS the root of all evil.
NOT money, but the LOVE of money.
For those of you who are not following (for whatever reason), it means, "Follow the money."
farronfolbright
(logged in user) July 11, 2009, 8:46am (report abuse)Sorry, but 1,000 characters is just not cuttin' it!
The internet is a very wonderful, powerful, and enlightening tool for those who choose to put forth a little effort to find what they are looking for. Over the course of about 6 hours I read some of the RLA, NRLA, and a plethora of interpretations and opinions spanning the last 60 or so years and I have concluded that anything relating to any of this, having been originally submitted more than 10 years ago, should be torn up, erased, destroyed, and forgotten, and all things related to any of this should be evaluated in accordance with what is standard, acceptable, honest, and descent practices today. It's just not rational to keep revising, amending, and rewording laws and codes written 40, 50, 60......230ish years ago meant for the governing of the people of that respective era. (sh*t, it's late, I'm tired, you know what I'm saying, and if you don't this next part is especially for you)
fed up with fed ex
July 14, 2009, 5:50pm (report abuse)I work for fed ex for 11 years and im just fed up. They have almost taken everything they could take plus sum. We need this to pass. they now what the results will be less executive pay and bonuses.
TonyJT
July 14, 2009, 6:00pm (report abuse)FedEx is the only company in the transportation industry with drivers, package handlers, and other non-airline employees covered by the Railway Labor Act.
Bailout? lol
UPS is the strongest company in it's industry and is not seeking a "BAILOUT" from Congress....the company is working to eliminate the advantage given ONLY to FedEx.
When Fedex delivers a package to your door it is not delivered by a pilot of an airplane, the package must be placed on the truck and delivered by a driver to your door.
Fedex should fall under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) as does all other commercial drivers in the US... ALL COMMERCIAL DRIVERS, not just UPS. This is not just about FEDEX and UPS.
Brown Driver
July 15, 2009, 4:01pm (report abuse)Alot of good opinons and aruments. Unfortunately the Union and UPS wants the upper hand in our industry. I will not be writing a letter to my congressman, as UPS wants us to do, because I do not agree with their agenda, and will not bring "fairness" in the industry. You dont like your job? Look for another one. ;o)
Brown
July 16, 2009, 2:56pm (report abuse)FedEx introduced a last piece of legislation years ago and last minute so that they will fall under the RLA and not under regular labor rules which makes all other companies yes including UPS not be able to compete fairly. FedEx has no business being under railroad laws since they are a delivery Co. I'm a conservative republican and not too fund of unions and many cases, but I also want my company (UPS) to be able to compete fair. Is up to FedEx employees if they want to go union but when our contracts finish and FedEx makes threats to customers about us going to strike and their excempt because of a law protecting them, then I have a problem! I don't like democrats but in this case, well I hate to tell you guys but its a majority of democrats in the senate, and they will probably side with a union company this time rather than not!.
DJC
July 17, 2009, 4:28pm (report abuse)This is not about FedEx, or UPS, It is about giving the employee a chance to voice his opinion. (union or not) It does not automatically turn FedEx into a union shop if it passes,but entitlies the employees a chance to reap the benefits that goes with becoming union, if they so wish. Fred Smith has kept the employees under thumb for long enough. To read the FedEx sponsored blog you would think it was paradise,but try to make a relevant comment and you get censored. Can Fred see the writing on the wall and realize the majority of his working class employees are not brainwashed as the others that profess the happiness at Freddyland! This will pass in it's entire form, and be a great victory for working class employee! BE PREPARED! VERY PREPARED!!!HA!HA!HA!!!
Truth Part 2
July 17, 2009, 4:54pm (report abuse)Now FedEx is both ground and air like 46 of their competitors which are NOT classified under the RLA. Companies like UPS which like FedEx is a ground and air delivery company. The reauthorization simply corrects the misclassification to make FedEx be under the same laws that govern 46 other competitors in it's industry. It also makes provisions for FedEx employees to have their Federal right to unionize a better reality. All US citizens have the right by Federal Law to unionize however certain labor laws make thos more difficult and that is why FedEx is fighting this reclassification along with their not wanting to be appropiately classified with their competitors.
UPSer
July 21, 2009, 11:09am (report abuse)UPS is coercing it's employees to hand-write letters to their senators for the support of this bill. However they do not provide an explanation of what the bill is nor do they give them a choice. They (upper management) herd them into a room and give them 4 pieces of paper and 4 envelopes along with a pre-written letter they are to copy. They proceed to chant the mantra that this law makes it 'fair' and it will put FedEx on 'a level playing field'. All the while dodging legitimate questions about what the letter is for and saying things like, 'fair' and 'it's the right thing to do, never giving any facts. I know because I'm a supervisor at UPS. We were given clear instruction that we 'WILL' write these letters. We were never given the option. After not writing the letter and respectfully disagreeing with my superior, I am harassed and looked down upon by the rest of the management team. I fear for my job as one of the other supervisors told me I was on the black list. Thanks UPS
DJC
July 21, 2009, 1:49pm (report abuse)UPSer, herded, coerced, harrassed, and blacklisted! Wow! You just made a strong argument for the need for the union. Thank You!
The reason they probably didn't explain, is they assumed you knew what was going on in the world around you! Myself I knew nothing about the letter writing campaign, and jumped at the chance when I was told. Nobody was coerced or herded, we were asked if we would like to and that was it. I know some like to exaggerate and want to be the victim all the time in this case it just wan't so. Save all the whining, and conspiracy theories for The Brown Cafe! Shame on your local if that is what happened, but bottom line is there mis no reason you shouldn't write those letters. Maybe the p/timers have trouble with it but thje fact that fedex is trying to mislead the public with the bailout ads should be enough to get you upset! In a matter of fact fedex accepted 100 million in a bailout after 9/11, no word of that?
farronfolbright
(logged in user) July 22, 2009, 4:35pm (report abuse)UPSer is exactly right. Management doesn't "ask" you anything. They take you to a conference room in small groups and "tell" you to write two letters to each congressperson. Management personnel are not union employees so the union won't be protecting his job. So, what is the punishment for not writing the stupid whiny letters? At DFW airport, you get sent to the worst area in the hub. This is no conspiracy theory, it's a fact. It's happening this very week to my best friend's part time supervisor. THE ONLY reason is because he refused to write letters about something he was unfamiliar with. Where's the justice and morality in that? There's not any. So, DJC, it sounds like you're one of those UPS managers, here to downplay any UPS wrongdoing that may come up. Well, it's no surprise.
patfdx1
July 23, 2009, 11:13am (report abuse)It makes sense that fedex ex press accepted some money after 9/11 considering it is an airline! all airlines were impacted and since express (airline) is about 75% of all the fedex revenue, it was impacted much more than a company that primarily relies on trucks.
if unions are so good, why do sorters/loaders in fedex express make more and have better benefits? just face the facts that some areas pay better at other companies.
i like my job. i wish my benefits weren't cut, but fedex has done more to keep jobs - especially couriers who, to my knowledge, have not been laid off during recession.
factfinder
July 24, 2009, 8:58am (report abuse)Hey,
Courier - They did not take away your pension. It changed for the better.
Now, before you get too down on FedEx, go talk to a YRC employee - 15% pay cut - pay freeze for 5 years. PENSION cuts for 18 months. Job security - 10 years furlough instead of 5. (Wow, I can be unemployed for 10 years instead of 5!) All Teamster brothers having this pushed on them by their Union. My vote would be to keep the playing field you have. Take 15% of your current salary and the $80.00 a month for Union Dues...
factfinder
July 24, 2009, 2:51pm (report abuse)I love all the "Posers" on here that say they work with FedEx and then say something dumb like, "we lost our pension" or, "FedEx Ground is part of the RLA." Al they are trying to do is say they work with FedEx and then show their "Union" talking points they have been handed. You guys need to go console your YRC teams. They are about to take a lubing thanks to their Union. The post are so funny, The situation for YRC is so serious.....I'm sorry for you guys at YRC......
capta320
July 25, 2009, 12:24am (report abuse)Some of these postings are not correct We are treated like pawns in the greed driven FEDEX. Pension frozen. (Based on best 5 yrs before frozen). Oh yeah thats a good deal for me. Guess wont be making more pay in the coming years.No 401 K match Pay cut over 20 % this year. Health care cost going up again. Only 90 % hospital coverage.Hope dont get sick Oh and FEDEX Health Care Plans are self-insured CIGNA manages them.
It s our turn now..a decent wage for hard work
DJC
July 25, 2009, 3:36pm (report abuse)It's not about the Teamsters, or UPS, it's about closing the loophole fedex has exploited for so long. No one says fedex has to go union but maybe with just having that choice, fedex would compensate their employees fairly.
patfdx1
July 27, 2009, 12:06pm (report abuse)capta - our pensions have not been frozen. your benefits under the TPB no longer accure and you are under the PPA. there ups and downs to every plan, but at least you will have the ability to take a monthly annunity under TBP and a lump sum (should you decide) under PPA.
what is your answer to unionized companies that have done the same or even worse (YRC)? union or not these are hard times.
capta320
July 28, 2009, 12:24am (report abuse)patfdx1. look at a Fedex Pension vs Ups Teamster Pension Same years of service $1900 for FedEx over $3000 for UPS. Plus over $ 600 per month taken out of FEDEX pension for medical.
Look at how 401K plans have done over last yr the PPA is a fancy name for one. Why change it in first place ..oh for company greed.
Well Yellow Freight having problems due to its merger with Roadway Express. Oh Roadway the company that Fred got RPS aka FedexGround from.
Hope you will be able to retire someday. By then retire medical benefits will be $1000 month..I am FED UP with Fedex
patfdx1
July 28, 2009, 1:48pm (report abuse)how many years of service do you have? you may have the best of both worlds? also remember the new pension is more portable, flexible and provides more options.
i will be able to retire. i plan to use my tbp as a monthly annunity and cash out my ppa and reinvest. sorry your bitter man.
DJC
July 29, 2009, 1:55pm (report abuse)Why is YRC even an arguement in regards to this bill? When fedex supporters have nothing to say it always pops up? Somebody clue me in! Are they even mentioned in the FAA Reauthorization Bill?
Willie
July 29, 2009, 8:30pm (report abuse)Does anyone know the currnet status of this bill. My understanding is that the Senate subcommittee on transportation has voted on it. Did the bill go through with all of the House provisions in it?
James
July 30, 2009, 10:28am (report abuse)Hey, it's DJC from the BB blogs!!
Why do people who support the bill cite UPS??? The common factor here is the unions. Those that support it will cite what UPS has done/accomplished. Those against it will cite other companies like YRC, the auto industry, etc. and how they've failed.
DJC
July 30, 2009, 12:52pm (report abuse)Hi James, Like on the other one, rhetoric but no substance! Now tell me one more time why it is the unions fault that YRC is struggling during hard economic times. In a matter of fact Mgmt. and the union are working together to help YRC weather the economic storm. Pay cuts, pension frozen, No 401k match, does that sound familiar? Well everybody is cutting back if you didn't know, union or not. Please, your argument about the auto workers, the rank and file didn't design the gas guzzlers that made American cars undesirable, they only built them. The price tag on a foreign car and American made are in the same ballpark,so do not blame the union for jacking up the price. Evidently those that oppose this bill all recieved the same keywords for their argument. It doesn't fly in the real world maybe it does in Freddyland!
James
July 30, 2009, 1:42pm (report abuse)DJC - It's not entirely the unions fault, but they certainly haven't helped. You could compare this to mgmt starting the fire and unions adding fuel to it. Gas guzzlers (not what anyone is touting these days, though) and inflated wages = recipe for disaster.
Do you remember econ 101? Leveraging jobs and passing costs on to the consumers are what unions do best.
See you back on BB.
G. James
August 31, 2009, 10:49am (report abuse)After reading through all this I don't think our so-called "Government" has any business with their sticky fingers in bloody cookie jars of Unions. I'm sick and tired of the Feds getting in the way of everything and anything - get out and stay out you stinkin miserable Red Coats.
Kevin
September 27, 2009, 4:44pm (report abuse)C.S said "I work for Fedex Express and it is stupid for us delivery drivers to fall under the RLA and I hope we get properly placed under the NLRA.Truck drivers and delivery drivers have no place being classified as aviation workers.IF we get placed under the NLRA then Fedex will have to pay us comparable wages to UPS. Right now I make $15.29 an hr while UPS drivers make around $30 an hr.Now does everyone see why Fedex wants to keep us under the RLA?"
I have worked for FedEx for 8 years and make $17.37 an hour driving tractor trailer vs. a UPS van driver who told me that they make $30 an hour. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not for a union or against one but I would like to work in an environment where that decision is mine and not managements. Anyone who says different hasn’t worked for the same company that I have.
James
September 29, 2009, 4:07pm (report abuse)Express can organize, as a whole.
The Mayor
October 23, 2009, 10:08pm (report abuse)I've been with FedEx Express for almost 20 years, and I can attest to the fact that things have definately gotten worse for us in regards to salary differences with UPS, pension, benefits, etc. but also just basic human treatment. Now some people have implied here that FedEx is a great place to work for, then I only have 1 question to ask.
If Fred wants to make sure that this vote doesn't pass and the RLA exemption stays intact for the company, then why doesn't he just allow 1 vote to his employees nationwide as the RLA status holds true to determine the outcome instead of all of this heated debate?
The answer is because he knows he will lose. Why do you think he created a false website (brownbailout) to post blatant lies? Why do you think he is spending tens of millions of dollars to prevent this from happening? If he truly wants an answer, then just let us all vote and give him the answer.