Home

Blog

What People Think

53% For, 47% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 2350, The Preserving Patient Access to Primary Care Act of 2009 (4 comments ↓ | 3 wiki edits: view article ↓)

H.R. 2350 would amend the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act to increase the number of primary care physicians and primary care providers and to improve patient access to primary care services.

(read more ↓)
[121 views]


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

MRE

June 4, 2009, 2:42pm (report abuse)

The bill's language actually changes the definition of primary care provider. I do not know if this is intentional or an error. Either way, nurse practitioners (NPs) will be authorized to provide the full breadth of medical services WITHOUT physician collaboration. NPs are licensed to practice independently in many states in the provision of nursing, health management, and other functions. However, this bill expands the role to all medical services. In addition, physician assistants (PAs) would be permitted to be supervised by NPs. This is in contradiction to regulation in all states that require physician supervision of PA practice. So, in effect, this bill replaces physicians in primary care with less-trained, less expensive PAs and NPs. The most effective primary care systems use all three - physicians, PAs, and NPs - to create high-quality, cost-efficient teams of healthcare providers. This bill gives me little hope for effective health care reform by this Congress.

HLP

June 4, 2009, 10:14pm (report abuse)

Tell me where the language is in the bill that eliminates physician collaboration

MRE

June 5, 2009, 12:26pm (report abuse)

Look at the definitions. The key is not what is said, but what is not said or is missing. Current language in the Social Security Act, which this bill amends, specifies physician collaboration to provide the complete array of medical services. That almost standard language is used in many other federal and state regulations. The notable absence of that language in this bill in effect allows an NP to independently, without physician collaboration, provide all primary care medical services. This lack of requirement for collaboration can then be used to override regulation at the state level. You will also notice that, for the first time, NPs are considered appropriate supervisors for PAs. This can also be used to supersede state regulations. Where this language originated is unknown. The PAs are very upset and want only physician (MD/DO) supervision. I can only assume the bill writers seek to promote less-expensive providers and move physicians out of the primary care market.

RAB7

September 15, 2009, 9:42pm (report abuse)

"So, in effect, this bill replaces physicians in primary care with less-trained, less expensive PAs and NPs." NPs are not "less-trained" my friend. Although NPs are mostly masters prepared, their training is quite intensive and comparable to physicians in family medicine.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)