Home

Blog

What People Think

15% For, 85% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 2200, The Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act (3 comments ↓ | 10 wiki edits: view article ↓)

H.R. 2200 would authorize the Transportation Security Administration's programs relating to the provision of transportation security.

(read more ↓)
[232 views]


Cost per :

From the Blog

Cost Estimates for More of This Week’s Bills

Too late for reporting to you in the weekly email or our follow-up post, a few more of the bills the House is dealing with this week have gotten cost estimates. H.R. 2200, the Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act costs $103.80 per U...

House Restricts “Strip-Search Machines”

As part of the debate on the the Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act, the House voted today to limit the use of “strip-search machines.” We blogged about it here and here. And here’s the text of the amendment as i...

Congress: Guantanamo No-Fly

In a recent post that was meant to be funny, I noted the proposal to put Guantanamo detainees on the no-fly list. Wrecking people’s day at the airport, the cruelest torture. Get it? Oh well. Anyway, that proposal - to put former detainees at Gua...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Lochnivar

(logged in user) June 1, 2009, 10:41am (report abuse)

That's a lot of negatives on this one, and nobody saying why they don't approve. I think this is pretty reasonable spending. The only think I don't like is the addition of fees. Ticket prices are already high enough.

carver53f

(logged in user) June 2, 2009, 5:04am (report abuse)

I am saying no to this bill. My reason is. We the people have no more money to give. Congress has spent on everything imaginable till they have spent this country into the poorhouse. Had congress had the foresight to see that spending on projects that only benefit a few would untimetly effect funding of projects that benefit ALL PEOPLE my vote on this matter may have been different. Until our representitives get the budget and their spending habits under control we have to just STOP SPENDING.

JamesSwidergal

June 6, 2009, 11:54am (report abuse)

Everytime the TSA farts Congress is wiping it's ass with taxpayer dollars. I can't see where pouring money into redundant security measures is cost effective.
Certainly it doesn't provide for more security, all this rule as does,as the entire Transpotation rules do is restrict more and more american citizens' from holding transportation related jobs.
Congress better wise up before we the people vote all of them outta office, and start over.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)