What People Think
 |
 |
13% For, 87% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 100, The Commonsense Auto Recovery Act of 2009
You must be logged in to your WashingtonWatch.com account in order to edit this wiki page.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
Don't have an account? Register for your free account now!
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Martin K
April 26, 2009, 5:02pm (report abuse)Congress is now the source of "common sense" in America? God help us all!
Tar and Feathers
May 6, 2009, 12:17pm (report abuse)No vehicles from GM (Goverment Motors) or will they be given better incentives as payback to buy their junk?
I would never one for that reason, more market meddling for your government approved vehicle.
Adios GM, good riddance.
Grintch
(logged in user) June 12, 2009, 1:53pm (report abuse)Common sense says don't buy a car if you can't afford it (or if the manufacturer is bankrupt or about to be).
It also says if its a bad idea after 2010 (when this expires), it's always a bad idea.
Kerryd
November 24, 2009, 5:25pm (report abuse)If they give back the money the buyer has paid, the money will just be charged at some other point. So why stick another piece of legislation on the agenda of our over-worked politicians?