<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for H.R. 5781, The Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act of 2008</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by For whoever (December 30, 2008, 19:30:14)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47893</link>
<description>Anyone who thinks federal employees make a net contribution to the economy don't understand how our government works. Taxes pay your wage. Those same taxes are taken from the citizens and companies who are the real engines of the economy.

My employees are well paid and have better benefits than most governments. For that I am rewarded with a hard-working, productive, and loyal workforce. Much better than I can say for many public sector employees....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47893@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:30:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by For: for Fed Employee  (December 29, 2008, 15:54:49)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47857</link>
<description>Hmmm, you are no different than the federal government.  You run a business, market your product, hire/retain employees, etc.  I'm sure you are getting what you are paying for based on what benefits you provide.  As a federal employee, I also contribute to the economy.  What makes you think you stand out above everyone else???...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47857@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:54:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Consider (December 29, 2008, 15:39:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47854</link>
<description>With the current economy some federal female employees can not afford to take 6 weeks unpaid. Somone above said that they were already goingto be paid anyway so whatis the big deal. If the USG can shell out 8.7 billion to banks, who don't know what they did with the money then they can do the 850 million over 4 years. PASS THIS BILL!!!!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47854@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:39:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by For hmm (December 19, 2008, 16:50:03)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47586</link>
<description>Top of your class? Is that when you started making up words? &quot;deplenished&quot;

I'm sure you can wait to start your family until you have some more leave saved up. Perhaps instead of using your sick leave on friday or monday to have that 3-day weekend you could try using it the way it is intended....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47586@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:50:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by to liberty (December 19, 2008, 14:44:35)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47579</link>
<description>did you go ask your neighbor for money when you drove down the highway that tax payers paid for, or sent your children to a public school, last time you used a public hospital, went to a state college, used a public park??? Come on!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47579@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:44:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by hmmm (December 19, 2008, 14:41:24)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47578</link>
<description>Today, as a fed, I helped to provide of 30,000 working poor with healthcare.  I have worked for the fed govt for one year, came from the private sector, top in class in college and wanted to do a job that I could be proud of.  My husband and I would like to start a family, but with my unused leave totalling 3 weeks we are unable to do so.  We are young and just starting out, we just bought a new house, have a decent savings and with our incomes can afford a child.  However, our savings will be deplenished if I cannot receive partial pay during my maternal period.  However, my husband who teaches special education children in a public school (tax dollars) will receive 6 weeks of paternal wages. We as fed employees and county employees, pay just as much tax as anyone else, but cannot use most of the benefits, so offering this one thing of 4 weeks of paid leave does not seem so ridiculous.  I can help the working class, but can't ask for help??...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47578@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:41:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Liberty (December 17, 2008, 09:37:59)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47506</link>
<description>I'm all for the bill with this exception. The person who is on leave should have to collect the money from their neighbors who would receive a credit against the taxes they pay. That way the shame of asking other people to support you would attach to your &quot;paid&quot; leave...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47506@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:37:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by For fed employee (December 14, 2008, 22:54:07)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47411</link>
<description>None of the above. I own my own business and make use of my time as I see fit. At least I'm contributing to the economy, unlike many public employees....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47411@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:54:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by fed employee (December 10, 2008, 15:29:56)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47284</link>
<description>just what do you do for a living that you are so quick to respond to others comments?  Are you living on a pension paid for by taxpayers, the consumer, or are you on welfare?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47284@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:29:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by For fed employee (December 10, 2008, 15:12:22)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47282</link>
<description>It is in the best interest of the federal employee families - not the rest of us. Tell it like it really is - you want something for you and you don't give one tinker's damn who has to pay for it.

The only way this should pass is if it requires each government employee to pay into an insurance fund. That money, and only that money, could then be used to pay for the benefit....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47282@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:12:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by fed employee (December 9, 2008, 19:17:36)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47251</link>
<description>The government is a business just like Ford, Nike, and McDonalds.  Yes, our pay/benefits are ultimately paid for by tax-payers, but that doesnt mean that every person that contributes $1000 towards taxes gets to be so judgemental on benefits to the employees.  Each business should decide whats best for their employees. This bill is in the best interest of families and it should be passed....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47251@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:17:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by For T (December 4, 2008, 20:40:49)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47137</link>
<description>The reason all you government employees pay so much tax as a group is because of the bloated size of the government. And with the democratic administration coming in it will only grow. Talk about socialism - just give them all a government job....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47137@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:40:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by T (November 30, 2008, 11:52:18)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#47012</link>
<description>This bill is a positive for Americans.  At least this would support people who are willing to work and have jobs rather than the deadbeat people that we have been supporting for many years.  It is hard to think of my tax dollars going to support someone who is perfectly capable to get a job and refuses to.  They receive wick and all kinds of tax breaks.  Why can't the working American receive this kind of help too.  Besides, a majority of the Federal employees pay more in taxes than any other employing agency.  Why not try to help each other out....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47012@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:52:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Proud Fed (November 24, 2008, 15:19:51)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46869</link>
<description>I think the fact that private companies get disability leave and govt emps dont is ridiculous in the first place.  We pay taxes, and are public servants!  We run the government, the public uses it! We should be afforded the SAME disability benefits that others get as well.  I am due in January and I get paid a heck of a lot less than half you private firm emps out there; we deserve to get 3 months paid leave as well!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46869@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:19:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by For Mother-to-be (November 20, 2008, 12:23:55)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46625</link>
<description>You call yourself a leader? You don't have a clue what a leader is. To make statements like you have here simply shows you for what you really are - an idiot who should be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46625@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:23:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Charlie (November 20, 2008, 10:14:47)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46604</link>
<description>Mother-to-be,

Why are you not trying to get the benefit for everyone, not just government employees?

As I'm sure you intended, you sound like an elitist with your statements about those who earn less than you. That simply shows how little you care about your fellow citizens. All you are interested in is making sure everyone else helps fund your time off. &quot;senior leader&quot; my butt - What a crock of B.S....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46604@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:14:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mother-To-Be (November 19, 2008, 14:54:26)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46537</link>
<description>I am a mother-to-be with 10+ years as a senior leader with the Government.  This is much needed for mothers and fathers.  This leave would not be a vacation.  I worked very hard and am blessed to have what I have (including the benefits).  I do not feel guilty for having a good job and I could care less what ignorant, selfish, greedy people think.  Part of my tax dollars (about $40K/ year) is going towards this $700B bailout for the big businesses.  Why is it okay to give to big businesses but not okay to give to hard working people?  Regardless, some of you only pay $5K a year in taxes.  That's hardly enough to pay my salary for a week.  Every little bit helps though.  Thanks!!!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46537@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:54:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeffery (November 17, 2008, 03:15:14)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46286</link>
<description>Continuing...  I also like Rep. Kenny Marchant of Texas' idea that employees be able to contribute to a fund that they would be allowed to tap for leave. When so much of our tax dollars are going to support utterly stupid and unproductive programs, studies, and such, I would like to see this country try and wake-up and see that we need to take care of our children. The statistics show that we are sorely not doing so now....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46286@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:15:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeffery (November 17, 2008, 03:11:20)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46285</link>
<description>This is a great bill and everyone should encourage their respective representative to pass this bill. It amazes me that something so family oriented is being trashed. This bill would allow BOTH parents, no matter the sex, to be able to take time off and care for their child. I dont find any problem with MY tax dollars going toward that. We have so many family issues in this country and a bill comes along that is pro-family and it gets bashed and bad-mouthed. I don't feel that 4 weeks is unreasonable, and I can safely say that everyone that has commented could not afford to take even 2 weeks of unpaid leave off to care for a newborn, let alone the 12 unpaid weeks that are permissable. After the 4 weeks if they wanted to take more it would HAVE to come from accrued sick or annual leave saved up. True, there is a provision for OPM to grant an additional 4 weeks at their discretion, but from what I see it would have to be extraordinary circumstances....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46285@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:11:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by for girl (November 14, 2008, 01:46:39)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46182</link>
<description>So which of those two categories do you put yourself. I suspect the first but with your potty mouth you probably are in both....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46182@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:46:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by girl (November 13, 2008, 15:18:40)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#46148</link>
<description>Charlie, you are an ignorant, arrogant, pig!  Everyone should be benefited in one way or another.  Like many other citizens, I'm tired of the crack whores and the unemployed getting all the benefits....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">46148@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:18:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Charlie (November 6, 2008, 22:39:36)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#45894</link>
<description>&quot;the best and brightest&quot; in government work? What a laugh that is....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45894@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:39:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by . (November 6, 2008, 21:56:03)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#45889</link>
<description>Bull**it!...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45889@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:56:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by pregnant (November 6, 2008, 21:43:35)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#45886</link>
<description>Mothers and fathers alike in any job take time off for their children.  A pregnant woman who must use her accrued time for family and self care is not abusing their leave. Paid maternity should be available for many reasons. One very good reason is recovery.  I personally am in need of a c-section, which is major surgey, and may require surgery during my pregnancy as well for complications. Even if I had 8 years to plan this pregnancy, all its complications can not be planned for.  Accruing a few hours a month that are used by medical complications run out long before birth. I pay taxes...I have no issue with my taxes paying for maternity leave for others who are in need.  My taxes already pay for plans I do not qualify for, so its only fair my taxes also go towards something that will benefit me and people like me....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45886@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:43:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Christine (November 6, 2008, 13:20:08)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5781.html#45858</link>
<description>Paid parental leave should be part of the benefits package needed to attract and retain talented federal employees.  Do you think anyone would go into federal service if there were no benefits?  And to those who would tell us feds to &quot;get a real job in the private sector&quot; if we don't like our federal benefits - whom do you think will leave government first and be hired on the private side?  The best and brightest, of course.  And whom do you think is going to be left to run your government for you after you drive all the quality employees into the private sector for lack of competitive employment benefits??  It will be the ones who can't find employment in the private sector.
  
It's time for the US to catch up with other first-world nations on this issue, and our goverment should be at the forefront of that effort by setting an example in how it treats its own workforce....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">45858@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:20:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		